Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kestrel vs MQTT: What are the differences?
Kestrel: Simple, distributed message queue system. Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM; MQTT: A machine-to-machine Internet of Things connectivity protocol. It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.
Kestrel and MQTT can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.
Kestrel is an open source tool with 2.8K GitHub stars and 326 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Kestrel's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Kestrel
Pros of MQTT
- Varying levels of Quality of Service to fit a range of3
- Lightweight with a relatively small data footprint2
- Very easy to configure and use with open source tools2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kestrel
Cons of MQTT
- Easy to configure in an unsecure manner1