Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kestrel
Kestrel

12
9
+ 1
0
ZeroMQ
ZeroMQ

144
131
+ 1
52
Add tool

Kestrel vs ZeroMQ: What are the differences?

Developers describe Kestrel as "Simple, distributed message queue system". Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM. On the other hand, ZeroMQ is detailed as "Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort". The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Kestrel and ZeroMQ can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

Some of the features offered by Kestrel are:

  • Written by Robey Pointer
  • Starling clone written in Scala (a port of Starling from Ruby to Scala)
  • Queues are stored in memory, but logged on disk

On the other hand, ZeroMQ provides the following key features:

  • Connect your code in any language, on any platform.
  • Carries messages across inproc, IPC, TCP, TPIC, multicast.
  • Smart patterns like pub-sub, push-pull, and router-dealer.

Kestrel and ZeroMQ are both open source tools. ZeroMQ with 5.33K GitHub stars and 1.57K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Kestrel with 2.8K GitHub stars and 326 GitHub forks.

What is Kestrel?

Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM.

What is ZeroMQ?

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Kestrel?
Why do developers choose ZeroMQ?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Kestrel?
      What companies use ZeroMQ?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Kestrel?
      What tools integrate with ZeroMQ?
        No integrations found
        What are some alternatives to Kestrel and ZeroMQ?
        RabbitMQ
        RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
        Kafka
        Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
        Amazon SQS
        Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
        Celery
        Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
        ActiveMQ
        Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Kestrel and ZeroMQ
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Kestrel and ZeroMQ
        No reviews found
        How developers use Kestrel and ZeroMQ
        Avatar of OnlineCity
        OnlineCity uses ZeroMQZeroMQ

        Our platform is based on interconnected services with a custom RPC protocol based on ZeroMQ and inspired by ZeroMQs LPP/MDP protocols.

        Avatar of Runbook
        Runbook uses ZeroMQZeroMQ

        Our backend monitors and reactions all talk over ZeroMQ.

        Avatar of clonn
        clonn uses ZeroMQZeroMQ

        Data Transfer

        Avatar of Max Litnitskiy
        Max Litnitskiy uses ZeroMQZeroMQ

        The blood

        How much does Kestrel cost?
        How much does ZeroMQ cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Kestrel
        More news
        News about ZeroMQ
        More news