Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Keybase Teams vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?
Key differences between Keybase Teams and Microsoft Teams
End-to-end encryption: Keybase Teams offers end-to-end encryption for all messages and files shared within the platform, ensuring maximum security and privacy for users' communication. In contrast, Microsoft Teams does not provide end-to-end encryption, which may pose concerns for organizations with strict security requirements.
Open-source encryption code: Keybase Teams utilizes open-source encryption code, allowing for transparency and independent verification of its security measures. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams' encryption methods are proprietary, limiting external scrutiny and auditability of its security protocols.
User authentication: Keybase Teams authenticates users using cryptographic proofs, enhancing the security of user identities and reducing the risk of unauthorized access. Microsoft Teams relies on traditional authentication methods, which may be more susceptible to phishing attacks and impersonation.
Integration capabilities: Microsoft Teams offers extensive integration with other Microsoft products and services, making it a seamless choice for organizations already using the Microsoft ecosystem. In contrast, Keybase Teams may have limited integration options, especially for organizations heavily reliant on Microsoft tools.
Community and support: Keybase Teams has a strong community-oriented approach, with active user forums and community support channels for troubleshooting and assistance. Microsoft Teams, being a product of a large corporation, may have more formalized support structures but could be less community-driven.
Cross-platform compatibility: Microsoft Teams offers robust cross-platform compatibility, with dedicated applications for Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and web browsers. While Keybase Teams also supports multiple platforms, its compatibility may vary depending on the specific features and functionalities offered on each platform.
In Summary, Keybase Teams and Microsoft Teams differ in their approach to encryption, authentication, integration capabilities, community support, and cross-platform compatibility.
As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.
Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.
- Slack
We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.
- Microsoft Teams
We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.
Keybase is a powerful and secure team-organizing software. And because Keybase is so transparently good at what it does, Keybase is a foundational software that facilitates the future of work: effective, inclusive, secure Remote Teams.
Keybase is a free, end-to-end encrypted, open-source program with almost limitless flexibility. Each Keybase user or team is a unique cryptographic identity. Each message or interaction that a user has with a team or other user, is verifiable and digitally-signed. Custom combinations of users/teams/bots, can be designed to catalyze Remote Teams of all kinds, this process can also be automated. Keybase includes Git integration for versioning, bots from multiple platforms to facilitate audio/video-conferencing, a Cryptocurrency wallet, and many advanced privacy features to make you more or less traceable.
Services like Slack and Discord are centralized platforms that perform analytics on your behavior and can sell or leak this data to 3rd parties. Any audio/video features available within Slack or Discord, are bound to be less secure and less flexible than excellent alternatives such as Jitsi. Slack and Discord do have a fun, causal feel to them, which can potentially facilitate social engagement in certain conditions (also many users are already on these platforms).
Centralized and Proprietary team platforms such as Discord and Slack have a large market presence (at least in the USA) based on their first-mover advantage, name recognition, and network effects from size. However these products do not have the flexibility or power of Keybase. Keybase excels on its own excellence, and also has an open and active developer community.
Find us on Keybase: @remotorteam (Keybase username) @remotor.public (Public Keybase Team)
we were using slack
and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.
on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.
we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.
Pros of Keybase Teams
- End-to-End encryption9
- Encypted Git repos8
- KBFS7
- Crypto wallet5
- Free5
- Open source5
- API interface4
- Written in Go3
- Explosion1
Pros of Microsoft Teams
- Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow29
- Mobile friendly24
- Free19
- Great integrations12
- Well-thought Design12
- Channels10
- Easy setup9
- Unlimited users6
- Strong search and data archiving5
- Easy to integrate with5
- Web interface4
- Multi domain switching support4
- Same interface on multiple platforms3
- Great voice quality2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Keybase Teams
Cons of Microsoft Teams
- Confusing UI17
- Bad performance on init and after quite a use12
- Bad Usermanagement10
- No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)6
- Can't see all members in a video meeting6
- Unable to Mute users5
- No Markdown Support5
- You don't really own your messages4
- MIssing public channels4
- Forced WYSIWYG4
- Stubborn, unused friendly3
- Challenging Onboarding3
- No linux support3
- Audio support problems1