Keycloak vs OAuth.io

Overview

OAuth.io

Stacks21

Followers145

Votes12

Keycloak

Stacks780

Followers1.3K

Votes102

Keycloak vs OAuth.io: What are the differences?

User Management: Keycloak provides built-in user management functionality, allowing organizations to manage user accounts, roles, and permissions within the Keycloak platform itself, while OAuth.io does not provide native user management capabilities, requiring integration with external user directories or services for user account management.
Integration Complexity: Keycloak is a standalone open-source Identity and Access Management solution, providing a comprehensive set of features for managing authentication and authorization, while OAuth.io is mainly focused on simplifying OAuth integrations through a unified API, making it easier to integrate OAuth providers into applications.
Customization Options: Keycloak offers extensive customization options for various aspects such as themes, login forms, and user flows, enabling organizations to tailor the user experience to their specific requirements, whereas OAuth.io primarily focuses on standardizing and simplifying OAuth integrations, with limited customization capabilities.
License Model: Keycloak is open-source software distributed under the Apache License 2.0, allowing users to modify and distribute the software freely, while OAuth.io offers a commercial license with pricing based on usage, providing support and additional features for organizations that require extra services.
Single Sign-On Support: Keycloak includes robust Single Sign-On (SSO) capabilities out of the box, enabling users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials, while integration with OAuth.io may require additional configurations to achieve similar SSO functionality.
Community Support: Keycloak has a large and active community of developers and contributors, providing a wealth of resources, documentation, and community support, whereas OAuth.io may have a smaller community presence due to its focused niche in simplifying OAuth integrations.

In Summary, Keycloak offers comprehensive user management, customization options, and Single Sign-On support, while OAuth.io simplifies OAuth integrations with a focus on integration complexity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on OAuth.io, Keycloak

sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

Keycloak
Okta
Auth0 Please advise which one to use.

258k views258k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

OAuth.io	Keycloak
OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.	It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.
Quickly integrate API providers; More than 100 providers available; Secured encrypted API; Simplified API calls; Web and mobile SDKs; User and app activity analytics; Request API: perform actions on behalf of users	-
Statistics
Stacks 21	Stacks 780
Followers 145	Followers 1.3K
Votes 12	Votes 102
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 SDK's 3 Integration with 100+ Providers 1 Useful screenshots 1 Core oauthd open source 1 Heroku add-on	Pros 33 It's a open source solution 24 Supports multiple identity provider 17 OpenID and SAML support 12 Easy customisation 10 JSON web token Cons 7 Okta 6 Poor client side documentation 5 Lack of Code examples for client side

What are some alternatives to OAuth.io, Keycloak?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Satellizer

Satellizer is a simple to use, end-to-end, token-based authentication module for AngularJS with built-in support for Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter authentication providers, plus Email and Password sign-in method. You are not limited to the sign-in options above, in fact you can add any OAuth 1.0 or OAuth 2.0 provider by passing provider-specific information during the configuration step.

Related Comparisons

Keycloak vs OAuth.io: What are the differences?

User Management: Keycloak provides built-in user management functionality, allowing organizations to manage user accounts, roles, and permissions within the Keycloak platform itself, while OAuth.io does not provide native user management capabilities, requiring integration with external user directories or services for user account management.
Integration Complexity: Keycloak is a standalone open-source Identity and Access Management solution, providing a comprehensive set of features for managing authentication and authorization, while OAuth.io is mainly focused on simplifying OAuth integrations through a unified API, making it easier to integrate OAuth providers into applications.
Customization Options: Keycloak offers extensive customization options for various aspects such as themes, login forms, and user flows, enabling organizations to tailor the user experience to their specific requirements, whereas OAuth.io primarily focuses on standardizing and simplifying OAuth integrations, with limited customization capabilities.
License Model: Keycloak is open-source software distributed under the Apache License 2.0, allowing users to modify and distribute the software freely, while OAuth.io offers a commercial license with pricing based on usage, providing support and additional features for organizations that require extra services.
Single Sign-On Support: Keycloak includes robust Single Sign-On (SSO) capabilities out of the box, enabling users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials, while integration with OAuth.io may require additional configurations to achieve similar SSO functionality.
Community Support: Keycloak has a large and active community of developers and contributors, providing a wealth of resources, documentation, and community support, whereas OAuth.io may have a smaller community presence due to its focused niche in simplifying OAuth integrations.

In Summary, Keycloak offers comprehensive user management, customization options, and Single Sign-On support, while OAuth.io simplifies OAuth integrations with a focus on integration complexity.

Keycloak vs OAuth.io

Overview