StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Keycloak vs LDAP

Keycloak vs LDAP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Stacks95
Followers132
Votes0
Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks780
Followers1.3K
Votes102

Keycloak vs LDAP: What are the differences?

Keycloak and LDAP are both authentication and authorization protocols used in web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. User Management: Keycloak has built-in user management features that allow administrators to create, manage, and authenticate users within the Keycloak system. On the other hand, LDAP is primarily a directory service protocol that is used for storing and accessing information about users, but it does not have the same level of built-in user management functionality as Keycloak.

  2. Authentication Protocols: Keycloak supports a wide range of authentication protocols, including OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML. It provides a unified layer for authentication, making it easier to integrate with multiple applications and services. LDAP, on the other hand, primarily uses the LDAP protocol for authentication, which is a more traditional and older protocol compared to the modern standards supported by Keycloak.

  3. Authorization and Access Control: Keycloak provides a comprehensive authorization and access control system that allows administrators to define and manage user roles, permissions, and policies. This allows for fine-grained control over what users can access and perform within the system. While LDAP does support some level of access control through hierarchical directory tree structures, it does not offer the same level of granularity and flexibility as Keycloak.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: Keycloak is designed to be easily integrated with existing systems and applications. It provides a range of plugins and extensions that allow for seamless integration with various frameworks and technologies. LDAP, on the other hand, is primarily focused on directory services and may require additional customization and configuration to integrate with other systems.

  5. Centralized Identity Provider: Keycloak acts as a centralized identity provider, allowing users to authenticate once and access multiple applications and services without the need for separate credentials. LDAP, on the other hand, is primarily used for user directory services and does not provide the same level of centralized identity management capabilities as Keycloak.

  6. User-Friendly Interface: Keycloak provides a user-friendly web interface that allows administrators to easily manage and configure the system. It offers a range of features such as user registration, password reset, and social login integration. LDAP, on the other hand, typically requires administrators to use a command-line interface or specialized LDAP management tools, which may be less user-friendly for non-technical users.

In summary, Keycloak offers built-in user management, supports modern authentication protocols, provides comprehensive authorization and access control, offers easy integration and extensibility, acts as a centralized identity provider, and provides a user-friendly interface. LDAP, on the other hand, primarily focuses on directory services and may require additional customization and configuration for integration with other systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on OpenLDAP, Keycloak

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Keycloak
Keycloak

It is a free, open-source implementation of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Lightweight Directory Access is an application protocol that is used to crosscheck information on the server end.

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Statistics
Stacks
95
Stacks
780
Followers
132
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side

What are some alternatives to OpenLDAP, Keycloak?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope