StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Kotest vs Robolectric

Kotest vs Robolectric

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Robolectric
Robolectric
Stacks216
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks1.4K
Kotest
Kotest
Stacks12
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks695

Kotest vs Robolectric: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Kotest and Robolectric are outlined below:

# 1. Testing Focus:
Kotest is primarily focused on providing a flexible and powerful testing framework for Kotlin, while Robolectric is designed specifically for testing Android applications. Kotest can be used for a wide range of testing scenarios beyond just Android development.

# 2. Language Compatibility:
Kotest is built with Kotlin in mind, leveraging its features and syntax to provide a more idiomatic testing experience. On the other hand, Robolectric is tailored for Java developers who are working on Android projects and need to perform unit tests for Android components.

# 3. Test Execution Environment:
Kotest executes tests using the Kotlin runtime environment, allowing for seamless integration with Kotlin projects. Robolectric, on the other hand, provides a simulation of the Android runtime environment, enabling tests to interact with Android APIs and components.

# 4. Community Support:
Kotest has a growing community of Kotlin enthusiasts who contribute to its development and offer support to users. Robolectric has a strong community of Android developers and testers who focus on improving the testing experience for Android applications.

# 5. Extensibility:
Kotest offers a high level of extensibility, allowing users to customize and extend the framework to meet specific testing needs. Robolectric, while versatile for Android testing, may have limitations in terms of extensibility beyond what is provided out of the box.

# 6. Continuous Integration Support:
Kotest provides robust support for integration with popular CI/CD tools and platforms, making it easier to incorporate automated testing into the development workflow. Robolectric, being Android-centric, may require additional configuration steps for seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines.

In Summary, Kotest and Robolectric differ in their focus, language compatibility, test execution environment, community support, extensibility, and CI support, catering to different testing needs in Kotlin and Android development respectively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robolectric
Robolectric
Kotest
Kotest

It is a framework that brings fast and reliable unit tests to Android. Tests run inside the JVM on your workstation in seconds. Test drive your Android application with robolectric

It is a flexible and comprehensive testing project for Kotlin with multiplatform support.

Test APIs & Isolation; Run Tests Outside of the Emulator; SDK, Resources, & Native Method Simulation; No Mocking Frameworks Required.
Test whole collections with Inspectors; Reuse test logic for setup or tear down, with Listeners; Make use of custom plugins for integrations with tools such as Pitest; Test Arrow data types with the Arrow extension
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
695
Stacks
216
Stacks
12
Followers
31
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Android Studio
Android Studio
JUnit
JUnit
Kotlin
Kotlin

What are some alternatives to Robolectric, Kotest?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana