Ktor vs Lumen

Overview

Lumen

Stacks429

Followers673

Votes161

GitHub Stars7.6K

Forks992

Ktor

Stacks173

Followers339

Votes27

GitHub Stars14.1K

Forks1.2K

Ktor vs Lumen: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ktor and Lumen are two popular frameworks used for building web applications. While Ktor is a Kotlin-based framework, Lumen is a PHP-based framework. Despite both being web development frameworks, there are significant differences between the two that make each of them unique in their own way.

Architecture: Ktor follows a modular architecture where different parts of the framework can be used independently, allowing for more flexibility in development. On the other hand, Lumen follows a monolithic architecture, where the framework provides a pre-built stack for web development.
Language: Ktor is built using Kotlin, a modern programming language that is known for its concise syntax and strong typing. Lumen, on the other hand, is built using PHP, a popular scripting language for web development.
Performance: Ktor is known for its high-performance capabilities, thanks to Kotlin's ability to compile code to highly efficient bytecode. Lumen, while being performant, may not be as efficient as Ktor due to the nature of PHP and its handling of requests.
Ecosystem: Ktor, being relatively newer, has a smaller ecosystem compared to Lumen. Lumen, being built on Laravel, a widely adopted PHP framework, benefits from a vast ecosystem of packages and libraries that can be easily integrated into the application.
Routing: Ktor provides a flexible and concise routing system, allowing developers to define routes with minimal effort. Lumen, on the other hand, provides a more traditional routing system that is similar to other PHP frameworks, making it easier for developers familiar with PHP development.
Database Support: Ktor provides built-in support for databases through the use of plugins and libraries. Lumen, being built on Laravel, offers a wide range of database support and provides an elegant and expressive query builder.

In Summary, Ktor and Lumen differ in their architecture, programming language, performance, ecosystem, routing system, and database support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lumen	Ktor
Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.	It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.
-	Unopinionated;Asynchronous;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.6K	GitHub Stars 14.1K
GitHub Forks 992	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 429	Stacks 173
Followers 673	Followers 339
Votes 161	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 38 API 28 Microframework 19 MVC 16 PHP 12 Open source Cons 3 Not fast 2 PHP 1 Not fast with MongoDB	Pros 9 Simple & Small 8 Kotlin native 7 Light weight 3 High performance Cons 2 Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic" 2 Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise
Integrations
PHP	Linux Windows IntelliJ IDEA Kotlin macOS

What are some alternatives to Lumen, Ktor?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Ktor vs Lumen: What are the differences?

Introduction

Architecture: Ktor follows a modular architecture where different parts of the framework can be used independently, allowing for more flexibility in development. On the other hand, Lumen follows a monolithic architecture, where the framework provides a pre-built stack for web development.
Language: Ktor is built using Kotlin, a modern programming language that is known for its concise syntax and strong typing. Lumen, on the other hand, is built using PHP, a popular scripting language for web development.
Performance: Ktor is known for its high-performance capabilities, thanks to Kotlin's ability to compile code to highly efficient bytecode. Lumen, while being performant, may not be as efficient as Ktor due to the nature of PHP and its handling of requests.
Ecosystem: Ktor, being relatively newer, has a smaller ecosystem compared to Lumen. Lumen, being built on Laravel, a widely adopted PHP framework, benefits from a vast ecosystem of packages and libraries that can be easily integrated into the application.
Routing: Ktor provides a flexible and concise routing system, allowing developers to define routes with minimal effort. Lumen, on the other hand, provides a more traditional routing system that is similar to other PHP frameworks, making it easier for developers familiar with PHP development.
Database Support: Ktor provides built-in support for databases through the use of plugins and libraries. Lumen, being built on Laravel, offers a wide range of database support and provides an elegant and expressive query builder.

In Summary, Ktor and Lumen differ in their architecture, programming language, performance, ecosystem, routing system, and database support.

Ktor vs Lumen

Overview

Ktor vs Lumen: What are the differences?