StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Ktor vs Nameko

Ktor vs Nameko

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nameko
Nameko
Stacks20
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks468
Ktor
Ktor
Stacks173
Followers339
Votes27
GitHub Stars14.1K
Forks1.2K

Nameko vs Ktor: What are the differences?

Nameko: Python microservices framework. Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events; Ktor: Framework for quickly creating connected applications in Kotlin. It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.

Nameko belongs to "Microservices Tools" category of the tech stack, while Ktor can be primarily classified under "Microframeworks (Backend)".

Some of the features offered by Nameko are:

  • Focus on business logic
  • Distributed and scalable
  • Extensible

On the other hand, Ktor provides the following key features:

  • Unopinionated
  • Asynchronous
  • Testable

Nameko and Ktor are both open source tools. It seems that Ktor with 6.1K GitHub stars and 470 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Nameko with 3.25K GitHub stars and 317 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Nameko, Ktor

Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nameko
Nameko
Ktor
Ktor

Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.

It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.

Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Unopinionated;Asynchronous;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
14.1K
GitHub Forks
468
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
20
Stacks
173
Followers
79
Followers
339
Votes
0
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 9
    Simple & Small
  • 8
    Kotlin native
  • 7
    Light weight
  • 3
    High performance
Cons
  • 2
    Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic"
  • 2
    Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise
Integrations
Django
Django
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Redis
Redis
Sentry
Sentry
SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Kotlin
Kotlin
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Nameko, Ktor?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot