StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Ktor vs Sapper

Ktor vs Sapper

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sapper
Sapper
Stacks41
Followers56
Votes0
Ktor
Ktor
Stacks173
Followers339
Votes27
GitHub Stars14.1K
Forks1.2K

Ktor vs Sapper: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Language and framework: Ktor is written in Kotlin and is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients, while Sapper is a framework for building web applications using Svelte which is a JavaScript framework.
  2. Server-side rendering: Ktor primarily focuses on backend development and does not offer built-in server-side rendering capabilities, whereas Sapper is designed specifically for server-side rendering of web applications.
  3. Plugin ecosystem: Ktor has a growing ecosystem of plugins and extensions for adding additional features and functionalities, but Sapper has a more extensive ecosystem in terms of community-contributed plugins and integrations.
  4. Backend integration: Ktor is more suitable for integrating with existing backend systems and APIs due to its flexibility, while Sapper is more focused on frontend development and may require additional setup for backend integration.
  5. Learning curve: Ktor, being a Kotlin-based framework, may have a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with the language, while Sapper's integration with Svelte makes it more accessible to JavaScript developers.
  6. Performance: Ktor is known for its performance and lightweight nature, making it suitable for high-performance applications, whereas Sapper's server-side rendering may introduce overhead in terms of performance compared to client-side rendering frameworks.
In Summary, Ktor and Sapper differ in their language, focus, ecosystem, backend integration, learning curve, and performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sapper
Sapper
Ktor
Ktor

Sapper focuses on easy of use. It is alpha now and only compiled with rust nightly.

It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.

Async, based on hyper mio branch; Sapper supplies only basic framework; Sapper only processes small request and response (with small request body, returning small response body) now; Three level granularity (global, module, function handler) middleware controller and unified middleware presentation; Typesafe abstraction, keep the same spirit with hyper; For easy using, will supply some convenient macros to help write business logic; Global object cross requests;
Unopinionated;Asynchronous;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
41
Stacks
173
Followers
56
Followers
339
Votes
0
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    Less bundle Size
Pros
  • 9
    Simple & Small
  • 8
    Kotlin native
  • 7
    Light weight
  • 3
    High performance
Cons
  • 2
    Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic"
  • 2
    Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise
Integrations
Rust
Rust
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Kotlin
Kotlin
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Sapper, Ktor?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase