Ktor vs Total.js

Overview

Total.js

Stacks20

Followers62

Votes37

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks446

Ktor

Stacks173

Followers339

Votes27

GitHub Stars14.1K

Forks1.2K

Ktor vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ktor and Total.js are two popular frameworks used in web development. They have distinct differences that set them apart from each other.

Language: Ktor is primarily used with Kotlin, a modern programming language by JetBrains, while Total.js uses JavaScript and its framework is based on Node.js, an open-source server framework that runs on various platforms. This difference in language choice can influence the ease of development and the type of developers who would prefer each framework.
Scope of use: Ktor is more focused on building web applications and APIs, while Total.js is a full-stack framework that includes features for developing both front-end and back-end components of a web application. This difference makes Total.js a comprehensive solution for various types of web development projects.
Community Support: Total.js has a larger community compared to Ktor, which means more resources, plugins, and tutorials are available for developers using Total.js. This can be beneficial for developers seeking assistance and guidance during the development process.
Scalability: Total.js is known for its scalability and ability to handle large projects with high traffic efficiently. It offers features like clustering and caching mechanisms that make it suitable for projects requiring high performance under heavy loads. Ktor, on the other hand, might require additional configurations and optimizations for similar scalability.
Learning Curve: Ktor has a steeper learning curve compared to Total.js due to its utilization of Kotlin, which some developers may find challenging to pick up initially. Total.js, being based on JavaScript, is more familiar to a larger pool of developers, making it easier for them to get started with the framework.
Performance: In terms of performance, Ktor is known for its lightweight nature and fast execution speed. It is designed to be efficient and responsive, making it a preferred choice for projects where performance is a critical factor. While Total.js offers good performance, Ktor's emphasis on speed and efficiency sets it apart in this aspect.

In Summary, Ktor and Total.js differ in language support, scope of use, community support, scalability, learning curve, and performance, making them suited for various types of web development projects based on specific requirements and developer expertise.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Total.js	Ktor
It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC	It is a framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in connected systems using the Kotlin programming language.
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling	Unopinionated;Asynchronous;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.4K	GitHub Stars 14.1K
GitHub Forks 446	GitHub Forks 1.2K
Stacks 20	Stacks 173
Followers 62	Followers 339
Votes 37	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Fast 5 Rapid development 4 Low-code tools 4 Great support 3 Npm Cons 3 Lack of source code documentation 2 Poor community 2 Messes up global namespace and default prototypes 2 Developed as "one man show" 2 Poor design - 4000 line files	Pros 9 Simple & Small 8 Kotlin native 7 Light weight 3 High performance Cons 2 Not self-explanatory: relies on Kotlin "magic" 2 Relatively fresh technology - not a lot of expertise
Integrations
npm Node.js PostGraphile Sentry	Linux Windows IntelliJ IDEA Kotlin macOS

What are some alternatives to Total.js, Ktor?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Ktor vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ktor and Total.js are two popular frameworks used in web development. They have distinct differences that set them apart from each other.

Language: Ktor is primarily used with Kotlin, a modern programming language by JetBrains, while Total.js uses JavaScript and its framework is based on Node.js, an open-source server framework that runs on various platforms. This difference in language choice can influence the ease of development and the type of developers who would prefer each framework.
Scope of use: Ktor is more focused on building web applications and APIs, while Total.js is a full-stack framework that includes features for developing both front-end and back-end components of a web application. This difference makes Total.js a comprehensive solution for various types of web development projects.
Community Support: Total.js has a larger community compared to Ktor, which means more resources, plugins, and tutorials are available for developers using Total.js. This can be beneficial for developers seeking assistance and guidance during the development process.
Scalability: Total.js is known for its scalability and ability to handle large projects with high traffic efficiently. It offers features like clustering and caching mechanisms that make it suitable for projects requiring high performance under heavy loads. Ktor, on the other hand, might require additional configurations and optimizations for similar scalability.
Learning Curve: Ktor has a steeper learning curve compared to Total.js due to its utilization of Kotlin, which some developers may find challenging to pick up initially. Total.js, being based on JavaScript, is more familiar to a larger pool of developers, making it easier for them to get started with the framework.
Performance: In terms of performance, Ktor is known for its lightweight nature and fast execution speed. It is designed to be efficient and responsive, making it a preferred choice for projects where performance is a critical factor. While Total.js offers good performance, Ktor's emphasis on speed and efficiency sets it apart in this aspect.

Ktor vs Total.js

Overview