StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Laravel vs Meteor

Laravel vs Meteor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.7K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
Meteor
Meteor
Stacks1.9K
Followers1.8K
Votes1.7K
GitHub Stars44.8K
Forks5.3K

Laravel vs Meteor: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Laravel and Meteor

Introduction

In web development, Laravel and Meteor are both popular frameworks that offer different features and advantages. Understanding the key differences between these frameworks can help developers choose the right one for their projects.

  1. Architecture: Laravel is a PHP framework that follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It provides a structured approach to building web applications. On the other hand, Meteor is a full-stack JavaScript platform that uses a reactive programming model. Its architecture allows developers to write code for both the client and server using a single language.

  2. Language: Laravel is based on PHP, a server-side scripting language. PHP is widely used and has a large community of developers. Meteor, on the other hand, is based on JavaScript, which is a popular language for both client-side and server-side programming. JavaScript is versatile and allows developers to build interactive and responsive web applications.

  3. Database Integration: Laravel provides support for multiple database systems, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite. It uses an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) system called Eloquent to interact with databases. Meteor, on the other hand, uses a real-time database called MongoDB by default. MongoDB is a NoSQL database that stores data in JSON-like documents. It also supports other databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL through community-driven packages.

  4. Real-time Communication: Meteor is known for its real-time capabilities. It uses the Distributed Data Protocol (DDP) to establish a persistent connection between the server and client. This allows for automatic data synchronization and updates in real time. Laravel, on the other hand, does not have built-in real-time capabilities. However, developers can integrate third-party libraries like Socket.IO to add real-time functionality to Laravel applications.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Laravel has a large and active community of developers. It has a rich ecosystem with a wide range of packages and libraries available for various functionalities. Laravel also has a robust documentation and a dedicated marketplace for extensions and plugins. Meteor also has a growing community of developers, but it is relatively smaller compared to Laravel. It has its own package manager called Atmosphere, which hosts various packages for extending Meteor applications.

  6. Scalability and Deployment: Laravel is designed to be scalable and can handle high traffic applications. It supports various caching systems, load balancing, and queue management. Laravel applications can be deployed on traditional web servers like Apache or Nginx. Meteor, on the other hand, is optimized for real-time applications and may not be the best choice for larger, high traffic applications. It is often deployed using Meteor's own hosting platform or on cloud platforms like Heroku or DigitalOcean.

In summary, Laravel and Meteor are both powerful frameworks with unique features and advantages. Laravel is a PHP framework that follows the MVC architectural pattern, while Meteor is a full-stack JavaScript platform. Laravel provides support for multiple databases, while Meteor uses MongoDB by default. Meteor has built-in real-time capabilities, while Laravel requires third-party libraries for real-time functionality. Laravel has a larger community and ecosystem, while Meteor is optimized for real-time applications. Both frameworks can be scalable and offer deployment options for different use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Laravel, Meteor

Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
washie
washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsLaravelLaravelPHPPHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
Meteor
Meteor

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
Pure JavaScript;Live page updates;Clean, powerful data synchronization;Latency compensation;Hot Code Pushes;Sensitive code runs in a privileged environment;Fully self-contained application bundles; Interoperability;Smart Packages
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
44.8K
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
1.9K
Followers
23.7K
Followers
1.8K
Votes
3.9K
Votes
1.7K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Pros
  • 251
    Real-time
  • 200
    Full stack, one language
  • 183
    Best app dev platform available today
  • 155
    Data synchronization
  • 152
    Javascript
Cons
  • 5
    Does not scale well
  • 4
    Heavily CPU bound
  • 4
    Hard to debug issues on the server-side
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova

What are some alternatives to Laravel, Meteor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot