StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Laravel vs Node.js vs Rails

Laravel vs Node.js vs Rails

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails
Rails
Stacks20.2K
Followers13.8K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks22.0K
Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.7K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
Node.js
Node.js
Stacks200.4K
Followers164.5K
Votes8.5K
GitHub Stars114.1K
Forks33.7K

Laravel vs Node.js vs Rails: What are the differences?

Introduction:
This Markdown code provides key differences between Laravel, Node.js, and Rails, three popular web development frameworks.

1. **Language**: Laravel is based on PHP, Node.js uses JavaScript, while Rails is based on Ruby. Each framework has its own set of syntax and development environment, making language choice an important factor for developers.
   
2. **Architecture**: Laravel follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, Node.js follows event-driven architecture, and Rails uses the convention over configuration principle. Understanding the different architectural approaches is essential for developers to choose the most suitable framework for their projects.

3. **Performance**: Node.js is known for its high performance due to its non-blocking I/O model, making it suitable for real-time, data-intensive applications. Laravel and Rails may not perform as well in these scenarios due to their synchronous request handling.

4. **Community Support**: Node.js has a large and active community due to its popularity, leading to extensive documentation, plugins, and support. Laravel also has a strong community but may not be as extensive as Node.js. Rails, while having a dedicated community, may not be as large as Node.js or Laravel.

5. **Learning Curve**: Laravel is considered easier to learn for beginners due to its documentation and syntax. Node.js may have a steeper learning curve for those new to JavaScript programming. Rails, with its convention-based approach, also offers a learning curve that developers need to navigate.

6. **Flexibility**: Node.js is known for its flexibility, allowing developers to build a wide range of applications. Laravel provides a more structured approach, making it suitable for large-scale projects. Rails, with its opinionated configurations, may offer a more streamlined development process but potentially limits flexibility.

In Summary, key differences between Laravel, Node.js, and Rails lie in their language, architecture, performance, community support, learning curve, and flexibility, impacting the choice of framework for developers based on project requirements. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails, Laravel, Node.js

Sachin
Sachin

Mar 25, 2020

Needs advice

Which is better to learn first as a beginner? Is it true that django is going out of the trend?

I was thinking to learn nodejs but after some thoughts I moved to django and learned most of the basics. Should I learn django more deeply or else drop the django learning and start learning nodejs from scratch?

Please help.

283k views283k
Comments
abderrahmane
abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k
Comments
Fabian
Fabian

May 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGraphQLGraphQLC++C++SymfonySymfony

I'm about to begin working on an API, for which I plan to add GraphQL connectivity for processing data. The data processed will mainly be audio files being downloaded/uploaded with some user messaging & authentication.

I don't mind the difficulty in any service since I've used C++ (for data structures & algorithms at least) and would also say I am patient and can learn fairly quickly. My main concerns would be their performance, libraries/community, and job marketability.

Why I'm stuck between these three...

Symfony: I've programmed in PHP for back-end in a previous internship and may do so again in a few months.

Node.js: It's newer than PHP, and it's JavaScript where my front-end stack will be React and (likely) React Native.

Golang: It's newer than PHP, I've heard of its good performance, and it would be nice to learn a new (growing) language.

2.4M views2.4M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails
Rails
Laravel
Laravel
Node.js
Node.js

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

-
Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
114.1K
GitHub Forks
22.0K
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
33.7K
Stacks
20.2K
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
200.4K
Followers
13.8K
Followers
23.7K
Followers
164.5K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
3.9K
Votes
8.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 860
    Rapid development
  • 653
    Great gems
  • 607
    Great community
  • 486
    Convention over configuration
  • 418
    Mvc
Cons
  • 24
    Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
  • 14
    Poor raw performance
  • 12
    Asset system is too primitive and outdated
  • 6
    Bloat in models
  • 6
    Heavy use of mixins
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Pros
  • 1439
    Npm
  • 1279
    Javascript
  • 1129
    Great libraries
  • 1012
    High-performance
  • 805
    Open source
Cons
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 45
    New framework every day
  • 40
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 33
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 24
    Callback
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rails, Laravel, Node.js?

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Play

Play

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase