LibreNMS vs Snort

Overview

LibreNMS

Stacks55

Followers186

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks2.5K

Snort

Stacks36

Followers104

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.1K

Forks640

LibreNMS vs Snort: What are the differences?

Key Differences between LibreNMS and Snort

Functionality: LibreNMS is a network monitoring system that focuses on providing comprehensive visibility into network devices, while Snort is an intrusion detection system (IDS) and intrusion prevention system (IPS) that primarily focuses on recognizing and preventing malicious network traffic.
Monitoring Approach: LibreNMS utilizes SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) to collect data and monitor network devices, providing administrators with real-time visibility and historical performance data. On the other hand, Snort performs deep packet inspection to analyze network traffic for potential security threats and anomalies.
Alerting Mechanism: LibreNMS alerts administrators about performance issues and health status of network devices, while Snort alerts about potential security incidents and policy violations. The alerting mechanisms differ significantly based on each tool's primary focus on network monitoring or security threat detection.
Deployment Environment: LibreNMS is commonly used in IT departments, data centers, and network operation centers to monitor and manage network infrastructure. In contrast, Snort is often deployed in security-focused environments such as corporate networks, government agencies, and security operations centers to detect and prevent cyber threats.
Community and Support: LibreNMS has a strong open-source community that actively contributes to the development and improvement of the tool, providing users with resources, plugins, and extensions. Snort also has a supportive community but primarily focuses on security professionals and researchers who collaborate to enhance threat detection capabilities.
Cost and Licensing: LibreNMS is open-source software distributed under the GPLv3 license, allowing users to download, modify, and distribute the code freely. Snort, on the other hand, offers both open-source and commercial versions, with additional features and support available in the commercial offerings for enterprise deployments.

In Summary, LibreNMS and Snort differ in functionality, monitoring approach, alerting mechanism, deployment environments, community support, and cost and licensing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LibreNMS	Snort
It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.	It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.
Monitoring; Alerting; Distributed monitoring; Open-source; Automatic discovery; API; Billing system; Automatic updates	Intrusion Agent; IPSx; IPS; NGIPS; IPS detection and blocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.4K	GitHub Stars 3.1K
GitHub Forks 2.5K	GitHub Forks 640
Stacks 55	Stacks 36
Followers 186	Followers 104
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Datadog Kong EasyEngine Plesk Server Density OpenResty OpsDash Scalyr	Windows FreeBSD CentOS Fedora

What are some alternatives to LibreNMS, Snort?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Related Comparisons

LibreNMS vs Snort: What are the differences?

Key Differences between LibreNMS and Snort

Functionality: LibreNMS is a network monitoring system that focuses on providing comprehensive visibility into network devices, while Snort is an intrusion detection system (IDS) and intrusion prevention system (IPS) that primarily focuses on recognizing and preventing malicious network traffic.
Monitoring Approach: LibreNMS utilizes SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) to collect data and monitor network devices, providing administrators with real-time visibility and historical performance data. On the other hand, Snort performs deep packet inspection to analyze network traffic for potential security threats and anomalies.
Alerting Mechanism: LibreNMS alerts administrators about performance issues and health status of network devices, while Snort alerts about potential security incidents and policy violations. The alerting mechanisms differ significantly based on each tool's primary focus on network monitoring or security threat detection.
Deployment Environment: LibreNMS is commonly used in IT departments, data centers, and network operation centers to monitor and manage network infrastructure. In contrast, Snort is often deployed in security-focused environments such as corporate networks, government agencies, and security operations centers to detect and prevent cyber threats.
Community and Support: LibreNMS has a strong open-source community that actively contributes to the development and improvement of the tool, providing users with resources, plugins, and extensions. Snort also has a supportive community but primarily focuses on security professionals and researchers who collaborate to enhance threat detection capabilities.
Cost and Licensing: LibreNMS is open-source software distributed under the GPLv3 license, allowing users to download, modify, and distribute the code freely. Snort, on the other hand, offers both open-source and commercial versions, with additional features and support available in the commercial offerings for enterprise deployments.

In Summary, LibreNMS and Snort differ in functionality, monitoring approach, alerting mechanism, deployment environments, community support, and cost and licensing models.

LibreNMS vs Snort

Overview