StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. Linux Kernel vs MQX RTOS

Linux Kernel vs MQX RTOS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Linux Kernel
Linux Kernel
Stacks74
Followers81
Votes2
MQX RTOS
MQX RTOS
Stacks6
Followers7
Votes0

Linux Kernel vs MQX RTOS: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of embedded systems, the choice between Linux Kernel and MQX RTOS is crucial depending on the project's requirements. Both have unique features and differences that can impact the overall system performance and development process.

  1. Real-time Capabilities: The Linux Kernel, although capable of real-time processing, is not considered a real-time operating system by default. On the other hand, MQX RTOS is specifically designed to offer real-time capabilities, ensuring deterministic behavior and low latency for critical applications demanding precise timing and response.

  2. Footprint and Resource Usage: Linux Kernel, being a full-fledged OS, is typically heavier in terms of footprint and resource usage compared to MQX RTOS, which is tailored for resource-constrained environments. For applications with limited memory and processing power, MQX RTOS can be more efficient in terms of system resources utilization.

  3. Customizability and Modularity: Linux Kernel provides a high degree of customizability and modularity due to its open-source nature, allowing developers to tailor the system according to specific requirements. In contrast, MQX RTOS offers a more streamlined and predefined architecture, which can be advantageous for simpler embedded applications with less complexity.

  4. Community Support and Ecosystem: Linux Kernel benefits from a large and active community of developers, resulting in extensive support, documentation, and a wide range of available software and drivers. MQX RTOS, while having a dedicated user base, may have a more limited ecosystem and community support compared to Linux, potentially affecting the availability of resources for troubleshooting and development assistance.

  5. Licensing Costs and Commercial Support: Linux Kernel is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective option for many projects. In contrast, MQX RTOS may require licensing fees for commercial usage, and additional costs for professional support services. Depending on the project budget and requirements, the cost factor can influence the decision between the two operating systems.

In Summary, the key differences between Linux Kernel and MQX RTOS lie in their real-time capabilities, resource efficiency, customizability, community support, and licensing costs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Linux Kernel, MQX RTOS

Jennifer
Jennifer

Mar 16, 2020

Needs advice

Netdata introduces Linux eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) monitoring. With this enabled, monitor real-time metrics of Linux kernel functions and actions from the very same monitoring and troubleshooting dashboard used for watching entire systems, or even entire infrastructures.

This collector uses eBPF to monitor system calls inside your operating system’s kernel. For now, the main goal of this plugin is to monitor IO and process management on the host where it is running.

67.2k views67.2k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Linux Kernel
Linux Kernel
MQX RTOS
MQX RTOS

Development on the LInux kernel.

It is designed to have a modern, component-based microkernel architecture allowing for customization by feature, size, and speed by selecting the components engineers wish to include while meeting the tight memory constraints of embedded systems.

-
Small Code Density; Component-based Architecture; Full and Lightweight Components; Real-time, Priority-based Preemptive, Multithreading; Optimized for NXP Architecture; Scheduling; Code Reuse; Intuitive API; Fast Boot Sequence; Simple Message Passing
Statistics
Stacks
74
Stacks
6
Followers
81
Followers
7
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    The best
  • 1
    Sometimes you just have to write your own drivers
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Linux Kernel, MQX RTOS?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase