Linux Mint vs Manjaro: What are the differences?
Introduction
Linux Mint and Manjaro are both popular Linux distributions known for their user-friendly interfaces and stability. While they share similarities in terms of being Linux-based operating systems, there are key differences that set them apart.
-
Package Managers: One of the main differences between Linux Mint and Manjaro lies in their package managers. Linux Mint uses the Advanced Package Tool (APT) for package management, which is well-established and widely supported. On the other hand, Manjaro uses the pacman package manager, which is specifically designed for Arch-based distributions. This means that Manjaro offers a more bleeding-edge experience, with access to the latest software updates and a rolling release model, while Linux Mint provides a more stable and reliable experience by focusing on thoroughly tested packages.
-
Desktop Environments: Both Linux Mint and Manjaro come with different desktop environments to choose from, offering flexibility in terms of customization and user experience. Linux Mint primarily uses the Cinnamon and MATE desktop environments, both of which are designed to provide a traditional desktop experience with a focus on simplicity and ease-of-use. On the other hand, Manjaro offers a wide range of desktop environments, including Xfce, KDE, and GNOME, allowing users to choose the one that best suits their preferences and hardware resources.
-
Installation Process: The installation process also differs between Linux Mint and Manjaro. Linux Mint provides a straightforward and beginner-friendly installation process, with a graphical installer that guides users through the installation steps. Manjaro, on the other hand, provides a more streamlined and minimalistic installation process, aimed at users with some previous Linux experience. It offers various editions, including an architect edition that allows users to customize their installation by selecting specific packages and configurations.
-
Release Cycle: Another key difference between Linux Mint and Manjaro is their release cycle. Linux Mint follows a fixed release model, which means that new major versions are released periodically, usually every 2 years, with long-term support (LTS) versions available for longer-term stability. Manjaro, on the other hand, follows a rolling release model, where updates are continuously released, providing users with the latest software versions and security patches without the need for major system upgrades.
-
Community Support: The level of community support for Linux Mint and Manjaro also differs. Linux Mint has a large and active user community, providing extensive documentation, forums, and resources for users to seek help and find solutions to their issues. Manjaro, being an Arch-based distribution, has a more niche community, although it is growing rapidly. While both distributions have their dedicated communities, Linux Mint generally offers more accessible and beginner-friendly resources for support.
-
Popularity and Target Audience: Linux Mint and Manjaro have different levels of popularity and target different audiences. Linux Mint has gained popularity for its ease-of-use and stability, making it a popular choice among beginners and those coming from other operating systems. Manjaro, on the other hand, has gained popularity among more tech-savvy users and enthusiasts who prefer a more cutting-edge experience, as well as those who are specifically interested in the Arch Linux ecosystem.
In summary, Linux Mint and Manjaro differ in their package management systems, desktop environments, installation processes, release cycles, community support, and target audience. Linux Mint provides a stable and user-friendly experience with APT package management and a fixed release model, while Manjaro offers a bleeding-edge experience with the pacman package manager and a rolling release model.
