StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Load Testing
  4. Load And Performance Testing
  5. LoadNinja vs Locust

LoadNinja vs Locust

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Locust
Locust
Stacks191
Followers317
Votes51
GitHub Stars27.0K
Forks3.1K
LoadNinja
LoadNinja
Stacks12
Followers40
Votes0

LoadNinja vs Locust: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between LoadNinja and Locust

LoadNinja and Locust are tools used for performance testing and load testing of web applications. While they both serve the same purpose, they differ in several key aspects.

1. **Programming Language**: LoadNinja uses a scriptless approach, allowing users to create test scripts without writing any code. On the other hand, Locust requires users to write test scripts in Python, making it more suitable for developers and testers with programming skills.

2. **Cloud-Based vs. On-Premise**: LoadNinja is a cloud-based tool that allows users to run tests from various locations globally, providing more comprehensive insights into the performance of the application under different conditions. Locust, on the other hand, is an on-premise tool that requires users to set up and manage their testing infrastructure.

3. **User Interface**: LoadNinja offers a user-friendly interface that simplifies the process of creating and running tests, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. In contrast, Locust provides a more hands-on experience, with a command-line interface that may require a steeper learning curve for some users.

In Summary, LoadNinja offers a scriptless, cloud-based solution with a user-friendly interface, while Locust requires Python scripting and an on-premise setup, catering more to users with programming skills.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Locust, LoadNinja

Vrashab
Vrashab

QA at Altair

Jun 23, 2020

Needs adviceonGatlingGatlingLocustLocustFlood IOFlood IO

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

142k views142k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Locust
Locust
LoadNinja
LoadNinja

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Define user behaviour in code;Distributed & scalable;Proven & battle tested
Reduce Test Script Creation Time by 60%; Generate Load with 1000s of Real Browsers; Analyze in Real-Time with VU Inspector and Debugger; Manage Your Performance Tests Efficiently & Effectively; Data-Drive Load Tests for Full Test Coverage; Test Applications in Local Network
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
191
Stacks
12
Followers
317
Followers
40
Votes
51
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to setup
  • 6
    Easy to use
Cons
  • 1
    Bad design
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
Jenkins
Jenkins
Zephyr
Zephyr

What are some alternatives to Locust, LoadNinja?

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Gatling

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Soundkit

Soundkit

Voice agent QA for teams who can't afford broken calls, compliance gaps, or production failures. Simulate thousands of conversations, validate legal

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope