StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Modernizr vs lodash

Modernizr vs lodash

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
Modernizr
Modernizr
Stacks28.1K
Followers2.1K
Votes0
GitHub Stars25.7K
Forks3.0K

Modernizr vs lodash: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, tools like Modernizr and Lodash play essential roles in enhancing functionality and improving efficiency. Understanding the key differences between Modernizr and Lodash can help developers make informed decisions on which tool is best suited for their project.

  1. Feature Detection vs Utility Functions: Modernizr primarily focuses on feature detection, allowing developers to test whether a particular HTML5 or CSS feature is supported by the user's browser. On the flip side, Lodash is a utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like manipulating arrays, objects, and strings, thus offering more general-purpose utility functions.

  2. Browser Support Testing vs Data Manipulation: While Modernizr is geared towards checking browser support for specific features, Lodash excels in data manipulation tasks. Lodash offers a rich set of functions for array manipulation, object iteration, and data transformation that simplify many common programming tasks.

  3. Size and Scope: Modernizr is a lightweight library that focuses specifically on feature detection, making it suitable for projects where browser compatibility is a concern. In contrast, Lodash is a more comprehensive utility library with a larger file size, offering a broader range of functions for various programming tasks.

  4. Use Cases: Modernizr is often used at the beginning of a project to detect browser capabilities and adjust the user interface accordingly. In contrast, Lodash can be used throughout the project for tasks like data manipulation, filtering, sorting, and other utility functions that simplify complex programming tasks.

  5. Community and Documentation: Lodash has a larger and more active community compared to Modernizr, which means more support and resources are available for developers using Lodash. Additionally, Lodash offers comprehensive documentation and examples for each function, making it easier for developers to get started and use the library effectively.

  6. Dependencies: Modernizr can be used independently without any dependencies, making it a lightweight and standalone solution for feature detection. On the other hand, Lodash has dependencies on other libraries like Underscore, but it provides additional features and improved performance compared to its predecessor.

In Summary, Modernizr and Lodash serve different purposes in web development, with Modernizr focusing on feature detection for browser compatibility, while Lodash provides a wide range of utility functions for data manipulation and programming tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, Modernizr

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
Modernizr
Modernizr

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

It’s a collection of superfast tests or detects as we like to call them which run as your web page loads, then you can use the results to tailor the experience to the user. It tells you what HTML, CSS and JavaScript features the user’s browser has to offer.

-
Easy to deliver tiered experiences; Make use of the latest and greatest features in browsers; Without leaving less fortunate users high and dry.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
25.7K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
28.1K
Followers
886
Followers
2.1K
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Modernizr?

Babel

Babel

Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase