Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Modernizr vs lodash: What are the differences?
Introduction
In web development, tools like Modernizr and Lodash play essential roles in enhancing functionality and improving efficiency. Understanding the key differences between Modernizr and Lodash can help developers make informed decisions on which tool is best suited for their project.
Feature Detection vs Utility Functions: Modernizr primarily focuses on feature detection, allowing developers to test whether a particular HTML5 or CSS feature is supported by the user's browser. On the flip side, Lodash is a utility library that provides a wide range of functions for tasks like manipulating arrays, objects, and strings, thus offering more general-purpose utility functions.
Browser Support Testing vs Data Manipulation: While Modernizr is geared towards checking browser support for specific features, Lodash excels in data manipulation tasks. Lodash offers a rich set of functions for array manipulation, object iteration, and data transformation that simplify many common programming tasks.
Size and Scope: Modernizr is a lightweight library that focuses specifically on feature detection, making it suitable for projects where browser compatibility is a concern. In contrast, Lodash is a more comprehensive utility library with a larger file size, offering a broader range of functions for various programming tasks.
Use Cases: Modernizr is often used at the beginning of a project to detect browser capabilities and adjust the user interface accordingly. In contrast, Lodash can be used throughout the project for tasks like data manipulation, filtering, sorting, and other utility functions that simplify complex programming tasks.
Community and Documentation: Lodash has a larger and more active community compared to Modernizr, which means more support and resources are available for developers using Lodash. Additionally, Lodash offers comprehensive documentation and examples for each function, making it easier for developers to get started and use the library effectively.
Dependencies: Modernizr can be used independently without any dependencies, making it a lightweight and standalone solution for feature detection. On the other hand, Lodash has dependencies on other libraries like Underscore, but it provides additional features and improved performance compared to its predecessor.
In Summary, Modernizr and Lodash serve different purposes in web development, with Modernizr focusing on feature detection for browser compatibility, while Lodash provides a wide range of utility functions for data manipulation and programming tasks.
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps.
Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.
Pros of Lodash
- Better than Underscore2
- Simple1
- Better that Underscore0
Pros of Modernizr
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Lodash
- It reduce the performance1
