StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Log4j vs Seq

Log4j vs Seq

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Log4j
Log4j
Stacks3.1K
Followers101
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks1.7K
Seq
Seq
Stacks134
Followers140
Votes26

Log4j vs Seq: What are the differences?

Introduction

Log4j and Seq are both logging frameworks used in software development. While they have similarities, there are also key differences in their features and functionality.

  1. Integration: Log4j is a Java-based logging utility commonly used in Java applications, while Seq is a distributed log search and analysis server primarily designed for .NET applications. Log4j offers extensive integration options with various systems and libraries, making it versatile in different environments. On the other hand, Seq specifically caters to .NET developers and provides seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem, including popular frameworks like ASP.NET and Entity Framework.

  2. Log Structure: Log4j uses a hierarchical structure called a logger hierarchy to categorize log statements, allowing developers to control the granularity of logging. In contrast, Seq organizes logs into streams that can be filtered and analyzed based on specific properties, making it easier to isolate and track logs related to a particular event or scenario. This unique log structure in Seq provides more flexibility and scalability when dealing with large log volumes and complex system architectures.

  3. Log Querying and Searching: Log4j primarily focuses on logging and doesn't offer inbuilt query and search capabilities. On the other hand, Seq is specifically designed for log analysis and provides powerful search functionality, allowing developers to query logs using a structured query language (SQL) syntax. This enables developers to precisely filter and retrieve relevant log information, facilitating efficient troubleshooting and performance analysis.

  4. Alerting and Notifications: Log4j doesn't provide built-in functionality for alerts and notifications. Conversely, Seq offers robust alerting capabilities, enabling developers to define rules and thresholds based on log events. When a log event matches the defined criteria, alerts can be triggered to notify specific individuals or systems. This feature in Seq enhances proactive monitoring and timely response to critical events or errors.

  5. Log Retention and Archiving: Log4j relies on external mechanisms for log retention and archiving. In contrast, Seq has built-in retention policies that allow developers to define how long logs should be retained, including automatic retention based on time or log volume. Additionally, Seq supports log archiving, allowing logs to be stored in compressed files for long-term retention or compliance purposes.

  6. Analytical Insights: While both Log4j and Seq provide log analytics capabilities, Seq offers additional features for advanced analysis. Seq supports data enrichment, allowing developers to augment log events with custom properties and contextual information, enhancing the log analysis process. Furthermore, Seq provides visualizations, dashboards, and charts that enable developers to gain insights into log patterns and trends, facilitating proactive system monitoring and optimization.

In summary, Log4j is a versatile Java-based logging utility, while Seq is a specialized log search and analysis server primarily designed for .NET applications. Log4j provides extensive integration options, hierarchical log structure, and a customizable logging experience. On the other hand, Seq offers seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem, a unique log structure with streaming capabilities, powerful log querying and analysis features, built-in alerting and retention policies, as well as advanced analytics capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Log4j
Log4j
Seq
Seq

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

-
log search; alerting; dashboarding; charting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.1K
Stacks
134
Followers
101
Followers
140
Votes
0
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 6
    Easy to install and configure
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Flexible query language
  • 3
    Beautiful charts and dashboards
  • 3
    Extensive plug-ins and integrations
Cons
  • 1
    This is a library tied to seq log storage
  • 1
    It is not free
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
.NET
.NET
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
Slack
Slack
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Serilog
Serilog

What are some alternatives to Log4j, Seq?

Loki

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

Zap

Zap

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

SwiftyBeaver

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana