StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Log4j vs SwiftyBeaver

Log4j vs SwiftyBeaver

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Log4j
Log4j
Stacks3.1K
Followers101
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks1.7K
SwiftyBeaver
SwiftyBeaver
Stacks7
Followers18
Votes0

Log4j vs SwiftyBeaver: What are the differences?

Comparison of Log4j and SwiftyBeaver

1. Programming Languages Supported: Log4j is a Java-based logging library, while SwiftyBeaver is specifically designed for Swift, the language used for developing iOS applications. Therefore, Log4j is not suitable for iOS development, whereas SwiftyBeaver is optimized for it.

2. Performance and Efficiency: Log4j is known for its high performance and efficiency in the Java ecosystem. On the other hand, SwiftyBeaver offers performance optimizations tailored for Swift, providing a seamless logging experience with minimal impact on application performance.

3. Customization and Configuration Options: Log4j provides extensive customization options through its configuration files, allowing developers to tailor logging behavior to their specific requirements. In contrast, SwiftyBeaver offers a user-friendly API that simplifies customization and configuration, making it more approachable for developers new to logging functionalities.

4. Community and Ecosystem: Log4j boasts a large and active community within the Java development community, ensuring continuous support and updates. SwiftyBeaver, being a more niche logging solution for Swift, offers a smaller but dedicated community focused on iOS development, providing specialized assistance and resources.

5. Integration with Logging Providers: Log4j seamlessly integrates with various logging providers and solutions, offering flexibility in choosing the appropriate logging mechanism. SwiftyBeaver, on the other hand, is designed to work efficiently with its cloud-based logging platform, providing a streamlined setup process for developers working within the Swift ecosystem.

6. Target Platforms and Environments: Log4j is widely used across different platforms and environments due to its compatibility with Java applications. SwiftyBeaver, on the other hand, is tailored for iOS and macOS platforms, making it the go-to logging library for Swift developers working within the Apple ecosystem.

In Summary, Log4j and SwiftyBeaver differ in their programming language support, performance, customization options, community support, integration capabilities, and target platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Log4j
Log4j
SwiftyBeaver
SwiftyBeaver

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

-
Time (with microsecond precision); Level (output in color); Thread name (if not main thread); Filename, function & line; Message (can be string or a variable of any type)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.1K
Stacks
7
Followers
101
Followers
18
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Swift
Swift
Xcode
Xcode
SQLite
SQLite
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Log4j, SwiftyBeaver?

Seq

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Loki

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

Zap

Zap

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana