StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Loki vs Zap

Loki vs Zap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zap
Zap
Stacks10
Followers33
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.9K
Forks1.5K
Loki
Loki
Stacks552
Followers328
Votes17
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.8K

Loki vs Zap: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Loki and Zap

Introduction

Loki and Zap are two distinct platforms that provide unique functionalities and features. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms can help users make informed decisions regarding which one suits their specific requirements best.

  1. Loki: Loki is an open-source, horizontally scalable, and highly available log aggregation system. It is designed to aggregate logs from various sources and make them accessible through a simple and efficient user interface. Loki focuses on storing and querying log data in a cost-effective manner.

  2. Zap: Zap, on the other hand, is a security tool, more specifically a penetration testing tool. It is designed to detect and prevent vulnerabilities in web applications. Zap provides a wide range of features like automated scanning, API testing, and security analysis. It helps identify security loopholes and offers suggestions for remediation.

  3. Data Focus: Loki primarily focuses on log data aggregation, storage, and retrieval. It helps in analyzing logs from various sources to gain insights into system behavior and troubleshoot issues. In contrast, Zap focuses on security vulnerabilities and provides tools and techniques to identify and fix them.

  4. Use Case: Loki is commonly used in distributed systems or microservices architectures where logs are an essential part of monitoring and debugging. It helps in analyzing vast amounts of log data efficiently. On the other hand, Zap is specifically used by security professionals and developers to identify potential vulnerabilities and ensure the security of web applications.

  5. Scalability and Performance: Loki is designed to scale horizontally, allowing it to handle large volumes of log data efficiently. With its efficient log indexing and querying capabilities, Loki can provide real-time log analysis. Zap, on the other hand, focuses more on the performance and thoroughness of security scanning. It provides detailed reports and analysis of vulnerabilities.

  6. Community and Support: Loki has a vibrant and active open-source community, contributing to its ongoing development and improvement. It benefits from a wide range of community-driven add-ons and integrations. Zap also enjoys an active community of security professionals who actively contribute to its development and provide support. Both platforms offer extensive documentation and online resources to assist users in effectively utilizing their capabilities.

In summary, Loki is a log aggregation system focused on storing and analyzing log data, while Zap is a security tool dedicated to detecting and preventing vulnerabilities in web applications. Loki provides scalable log data storage and retrieval, while Zap offers comprehensive security scanning and analysis. Users should consider their specific requirements and use cases to select the appropriate platform for their needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zap
Zap
Loki
Loki

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
23.9K
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
3.8K
Stacks
10
Stacks
552
Followers
33
Followers
328
Votes
0
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Opensource
  • 3
    Very fast ingestion
  • 3
    Near real-time search
  • 2
    Low resource footprint
  • 2
    REST Api
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Grafana
Grafana
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Helm
Helm

What are some alternatives to Zap, Loki?

Seq

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Log4j

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

SwiftyBeaver

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana