StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. LoopBack vs Lumen

LoopBack vs Lumen

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LoopBack
LoopBack
Stacks285
Followers556
Votes33
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.2K
Lumen
Lumen
Stacks429
Followers673
Votes161
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks992

LoopBack vs Lumen: What are the differences?

Key Differences between LoopBack and Lumen

LoopBack and Lumen are two popular frameworks used for developing web applications. While both frameworks have their own strengths and similarities, they also have some key differences. Here are the top 6 differences between LoopBack and Lumen:

  1. API Generation: LoopBack allows for automatic REST API generation by inferring the API from the data models, making it easy to create and expose APIs. In contrast, Lumen does not have built-in support for automatic API generation and requires manual configuration and routing.

  2. Database Integration: LoopBack provides out-of-the-box support for a wide range of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and Oracle. Lumen, on the other hand, primarily focuses on integration with the Laravel ORM, Eloquent, making it suitable for projects that heavily rely on Laravel's database capabilities.

  3. Authentication and Authorization: LoopBack provides robust authentication and authorization capabilities, including fine-grained access control, user registration, and role-based access. In comparison, Lumen offers a simpler authentication system but lacks the extensive features and flexibility provided by LoopBack.

  4. Microservices Architecture: LoopBack is designed with a microservices architecture in mind, supporting the development of scalable and modular applications. It provides features like service discovery, load balancing, and circuit breaking, making it suitable for distributed systems. On the other hand, Lumen is more focused on building lightweight and fast microservices and APIs, without the extensive support for microservices architecture provided by LoopBack.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: LoopBack has a larger and more active community compared to Lumen. The LoopBack community provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins, making it easier to find support and resources. Lumen, being a lightweight micro-framework, has a smaller community and a limited number of plugins and packages available.

  6. Scalability: LoopBack is designed to handle large-scale applications and can easily scale horizontally by running multiple instances. It provides features like clustering and process management, making it well-suited for high-traffic applications. Lumen, in comparison, is a lightweight framework focused on speed and simplicity, and may not be as well-equipped for handling large-scale applications.

In Summary, LoopBack and Lumen have key differences in API generation, database integration, authentication and authorization, microservices architecture, community and ecosystem, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack
LoopBack
Lumen
Lumen

A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
992
Stacks
285
Stacks
429
Followers
556
Followers
673
Votes
33
Votes
161
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback
  • 9
    Easy Database Migration
  • 6
    Code generator
  • 4
    The future of API's
  • 2
    GraphQL
Cons
  • 7
    Community is slow
  • 1
    Backward compatibility
Pros
  • 38
    API
  • 28
    Microframework
  • 19
    MVC
  • 16
    PHP
  • 12
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Not fast
  • 2
    PHP
  • 1
    Not fast with MongoDB
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
GraphQL
GraphQL
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, Lumen?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase