Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design for Angular vs Sass: What are the differences?
Syntax and Functionality: Material Design for Angular provides ready-to-use components and directives following Google's Material Design guidelines, making it easier for developers to create consistent and visually appealing interfaces. On the other hand, Sass is a tool that extends CSS with features like variables, nesting, and mixins, allowing developers to write more maintainable and organized stylesheets.
Scope of Use: Material Design for Angular is specifically designed for building web applications using Angular framework, focusing on providing a consistent design language and user experience. Whereas Sass can be used with any web development project regardless of the framework or library being used, offering more flexibility in terms of styling options and compatibility.
File Extensions: Material Design for Angular uses the standard file extensions for Angular components and templates, such as .ts for TypeScript files and .html for HTML templates. On the contrary, Sass files have a .scss or .sass extension, showcasing the difference in file formats and usage between the two technologies.
Community Support: Material Design for Angular being a part of the Angular ecosystem benefits from the strong community support and regular updates from Google. Sass, being an independent preprocessor, has its own dedicated community that continuously contributes to its development and improvement.
Integration with Tools: Material Design for Angular seamlessly integrates with Angular CLI and other Angular-specific tools for building, testing, and deploying applications. Sass, being a standalone technology, can be used with various task runners and build tools like Gulp or Webpack to enhance the workflow and optimize the styling process.
Learning Curve: Material Design for Angular requires a basic understanding of Angular concepts and directives to effectively utilize its components and functionalities. On the other hand, Sass can be quickly adopted by developers familiar with CSS, offering a smoother learning curve with its easy-to-understand syntax and features.
In Summary, Material Design for Angular focuses on providing a framework for building web apps with Angular and adhering to Material Design guidelines, while Sass enhances CSS with advanced features and flexibility for styling web projects across different frameworks and libraries.
Originally, I was going to start using Sass with Parcel, but then I learned about Stylus, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and PostCSS, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?
Pros of Material Design for Angular
- Ui components122
- Backed by google63
- Free51
- Backed by angular51
- Javascript47
- Open source34
- Responsiveness33
- Easy to learn30
- Quick to develop28
- Customizable20
- Powerful8
- Easy to start8
- Flexible6
- Themes5
- Flexbox Layouts4
- Great community3
- I like its design3
- Great extensions2
- Consistents1
- CDK1
- It's the best looking out of the box1
- Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs1
- Progressive Web Apps - to learn0
Pros of Sass
- Variables613
- Mixins594
- Nested rules466
- Maintainable410
- Functions300
- Modular flexible code149
- Open source143
- Selector inheritance112
- Dynamic107
- Better than cs96
- Used by Bootstrap5
- If and for function3
- Better than less2
- Inheritance (@extend)1
- Custom functions1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design for Angular
- No practical examples4
Cons of Sass
- Needs to be compiled6