Material Design for Bootstrap vs Polymer: What are the differences?
Material Design for Bootstrap and Polymer can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
"Bootstrap" is the top reason why over 14 developers like Material Design for Bootstrap, while over 49 developers mention "Web components" as the leading cause for choosing Polymer.
Material Design for Bootstrap and Polymer are both open source tools. Polymer with 21.1K GitHub stars and 2K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Material Design for Bootstrap with 19.9K GitHub stars and 3.31K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Polymer has a broader approval, being mentioned in 42 company stacks & 32 developers stacks; compared to Material Design for Bootstrap, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.
What is Material Design for Bootstrap?
What is Polymer?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Material Design for Bootstrap?
What are the cons of using Polymer?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Material Design for Bootstrap?
What tools integrate with Polymer?
In process of Learning Technics- Studing to know more. I was introduced in a Google event.
Polymer is another Google offering that focuses on Web Components, an up-and-coming collection of technologies that provide web developers with the ability to create customer HTML elements.
Polymer is super future-focused and really great to build in. The biggest plus for us is how its component-focused approach keeps things modular and maintainable. It also makes it really easy to implement material design.