StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Bootstrap vs Zend Framework

Material Design for Bootstrap vs Zend Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Stacks262
Followers215
Votes48
Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap
Stacks78
Followers206
Votes46
GitHub Stars65
Forks42

Material Design for Bootstrap vs Zend Framework: What are the differences?

  1. Customization Options: Material Design for Bootstrap provides a wide range of customization options through its robust set of pre-built components and templates, allowing users to tailor their designs to their specific needs. On the other hand, Zend Framework offers a more standardized approach to development, focusing on scalability and code reusability rather than extensive customization options.

  2. Component Libraries: Material Design for Bootstrap is based on Google's Material Design principles and comes with a comprehensive library of UI components following these guidelines. In contrast, Zend Framework is a PHP framework that provides a set of tools and libraries for building web applications, with a focus on modular architecture and flexibility rather than predefined UI components.

  3. Community Support: Material Design for Bootstrap benefits from a large community of developers using the Bootstrap framework, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums for support. Zend Framework, on the other hand, has a more niche community focused on PHP development, with resources tailored towards enterprise-level applications and complex web projects.

  4. Theme Integration: Material Design for Bootstrap seamlessly integrates with the Bootstrap framework, offering a modern and responsive design for web applications. Zend Framework, on the other hand, is more agnostic towards UI design, allowing developers to integrate any design theme or template without being tied to a specific visual style.

  5. Ease of Use: Material Design for Bootstrap is known for its user-friendly interface and documentation, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing web interfaces. Zend Framework, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and focus on best practices in web development.

  6. Performance Optimization: Material Design for Bootstrap is optimized for performance, with lightweight components and CSS stylesheets to ensure fast loading times for web applications. Zend Framework, being a PHP framework, focuses more on backend optimizations and server-side performance rather than frontend design considerations.

In Summary, Material Design for Bootstrap and Zend Framework differ in terms of customization options, component libraries, community support, theme integration, ease of use, and performance optimization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zend Framework
Zend Framework
Material Design for Bootstrap
Material Design for Bootstrap

It is an open source framework for developing web applications and services using PHP 5.3+. It uses 100% object-oriented code and utilizes most of the new features of namely namespaces, late static binding, lambda functions and closures.

It is an open source toolkit based on Bootstrap for developing Material Design apps with HTML, CSS, and JS. Quickly prototype your ideas or build your entire app with our Sass variables and mixins, responsive grid system, extensive prebuilt components, and powerful plugins built on jQuery.

Pure object oriented web application framework; Advanced MVC implementation; Supports multi databases including PostgreSQL, SQLite etc; Simple cloud API; Session management; Data encryption; Flexible URI Routing; Zend provides RESTful API development support.
Input fields; Textarea; Buttons (ripple effect working); Select; Navbar; Button groups; Input groups; Checkbox; Radio; Alerts; Progress bars; Jumbotron; Wells; Dialogs; Lists
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
65
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
42
Stacks
262
Stacks
78
Followers
215
Followers
206
Votes
48
Votes
46
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 25
    Open source
  • 11
    Community
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 2
    Many library
Pros
  • 16
    Bootstrap
  • 6
    Light weight
  • 6
    Awesome and simple to use
  • 4
    Google Material Design
  • 4
    Responsive
Cons
  • 2
    Not free for premo stuff
Integrations
Expressive
Expressive
PHP
PHP
GitHub
GitHub
Webex
Webex
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Zend Framework, Material Design for Bootstrap?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase