StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design vs Microsoft Fast Design

Material Design vs Microsoft Fast Design

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design
Material Design
Stacks594
Followers890
Votes14
Microsoft Fast Design
Microsoft Fast Design
Stacks4
Followers52
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.6K
Forks609

Material Design vs Microsoft Fast Design: What are the differences?

Material Design vs Microsoft Fast Design

Material Design and Microsoft Fast Design are two popular design systems used in web and app development. They each have their unique characteristics and approaches to creating a visually appealing and user-friendly interface. Let's explore the key differences between Material Design and Microsoft Fast Design.

1. **Visual Style**: Material Design focuses on realistic shadows, animations, and depth to create a visually engaging experience, while Microsoft Fast Design emphasizes minimalism, clean lines, and simplicity to provide a more streamlined and efficient design aesthetic.

2. **Color Palette**: Material Design places a strong emphasis on vibrant and bold colors, using a limited color palette to create contrast and hierarchy in the interface. On the other hand, Microsoft Fast Design opts for a more subdued and muted color scheme, prioritizing accessibility and readability in its design choices.

3. **Typography**: Material Design employs custom typography and playful font combinations to add personality and character to the interface. In contrast, Microsoft Fast Design sticks to more traditional and standard fonts, focusing on legibility and consistency across different devices and platforms.

4. **Component Library**: Material Design offers a comprehensive library of pre-built components and guidelines for developers to use, ensuring consistency and efficiency in design implementation. Meanwhile, Microsoft Fast Design provides a more flexible and customizable approach, allowing developers more freedom to create unique and tailored design elements.

5. **Animation**: Material Design incorporates subtle animations and transitions throughout the interface to provide a more interactive and dynamic user experience. On the other hand, Microsoft Fast Design tends to use animations sparingly, focusing on smooth transitions and micro-interactions to enhance usability without overwhelming the user.

6. **Platform Integration**: Material Design is primarily associated with Google services and Android platforms, offering seamless integration and a cohesive user experience across different Google products. Microsoft Fast Design, on the other hand, is designed to work well with Microsoft products and services, ensuring compatibility and consistency within the Microsoft ecosystem.

In Summary, Material Design and Microsoft Fast Design differ in their visual style, color palette, typography, component library, animation usage, and platform integration, catering to different design preferences and requirements in web and app development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design
Material Design
Microsoft Fast Design
Microsoft Fast Design

Material Design is a unified system that combines theory, resources, and tools for crafting digital experiences.

It is a collection of JavaScript packages centered around web standards, designed to help you efficiently tackle some of the most common challenges in website and application design and development.

-
Unopinionated; UI development and style guide tools; Bring your design system
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
609
Stacks
594
Stacks
4
Followers
890
Followers
52
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    They really set a new bar in design
  • 4
    An intuitive design
  • 3
    Simply, And Beautiful
  • 2
    Many great libraries
  • 0
    Composants
Cons
  • 2
    Sometimes, it can hang the browser
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Blazor
Blazor
Aurelia
Aurelia

What are some alternatives to Material Design, Microsoft Fast Design?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase