Material-UI vs Microsoft Fast Design: What are the differences?
Introduction
Material-UI and Microsoft Fast Design are both popular design systems used for building web applications. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other. Let's explore these differences in detail.
-
Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the Material Design guidelines developed by Google, focusing on providing a clean and visually appealing user interface with consistent and intuitive interactions. On the other hand, Microsoft Fast Design follows Fluent Design System principles, aiming to create a more immersive and engaging user experience with rich visual effects, motion, and depth.
-
Component Library: Material-UI offers a comprehensive set of pre-built and customizable components, including buttons, inputs, cards, and menus, making it easy to create aesthetically pleasing and responsive user interfaces. Microsoft Fast Design also provides a wide range of components but also includes more specialized components like popups, sliders, and tooltips, allowing for greater customization and flexibility in UI design.
-
Styling Approach: Material-UI leverages CSS-in-JS to provide a robust and modular styling solution. It uses the styled-components library, allowing developers to define styles directly within the component code. Microsoft Fast Design, on the other hand, adopts a CSS first approach, where developers can use CSS classes and variables for styling components, providing a more traditional and familiar approach to styling.
-
Supported Platforms: Material-UI is primarily focused on building web applications using React, but it also provides support for other frameworks like Angular and Vue. It has a strong and active community, with extensive documentation and resources available. Microsoft Fast Design, on the other hand, is specifically designed for building Windows applications using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It provides seamless integration with Microsoft platforms, enabling developers to create native-like experiences on Windows.
-
Customization and Extensibility: Material-UI offers a comprehensive theming system, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of their applications by changing the theme colors, typography, and other design variables. It also provides support for creating custom components and styling overrides. Microsoft Fast Design provides a similar level of theming and customization, allowing developers to adapt the design system to match their brand or application requirements.
-
Development and Maintenance: Material-UI is an open-source project with a large and active community of contributors, ensuring continuous development and frequent updates. It has a well-established ecosystem, with various third-party libraries and tools available. Microsoft Fast Design, on the other hand, is backed by Microsoft, ensuring long-term support and compatibility with their platforms. It benefits from the resources and expertise of Microsoft, providing a stable and reliable design system for Windows applications.
In Summary, Material-UI and Microsoft Fast Design differ in their design philosophy, component library, styling approach, supported platforms, customization and extensibility options, as well as development and maintenance characteristics. These differences cater to different developer preferences and use cases, allowing for a tailored approach to building user interfaces.
