Material UI vs miso

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

miso

Stacks3

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.3K

Forks153

Material UI vs miso: What are the differences?

Component Library: Material UI is primarily a UI component library for React, offering a wide range of pre-designed components such as buttons, cards, and navigation elements. In contrast, Miso is a lightweight web framework that focuses on building interactive web applications using the Elm programming language.
Styling Approach: Material UI provides styling solutions through JSS (JavaScript Style Sheets) allowing for component-level theming and customization. Conversely, Miso follows a more functional approach to styling through Elm's type-safe language and architecture.
Programming Language: Material UI is designed for use with JavaScript and React applications, leveraging the features of these technologies. On the other hand, Miso utilizes the functional programming language Elm, known for its strong type system and purity.
State Management: Material UI does not include state management capabilities and usually relies on libraries like Redux or React's Context API for managing application state. Miso, however, incorporates its own state management approach using the Elm Architecture, making state management seamless and predictable.
Server-side Rendering: Material UI lacks built-in support for server-side rendering, which can impact initial load times and SEO. In contrast, Miso comes with server-side rendering capabilities out of the box, improving performance and SEO for web applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Material UI benefits from a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. On the other hand, Miso's community may be smaller in comparison, but it provides a niche focus on functional programming and Elm-specific challenges.

In Summary, Material UI and Miso differ in their focus on component libraries for React and functional programming with Elm, styling approaches, programming languages, state management, server-side rendering capabilities, and community ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, miso

Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k

Comments

Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k

Comments

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	miso
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	Miso is a small "isomorphic" Haskell front-end framework featuring a virtual-dom, diffing / patching algorithm, event delegation, event batching, SVG, Server-sent events, Websockets, and an extensible Subscription-based subsystem.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 2.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 153
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 3
Followers 3.7K	Followers 13
Votes 445	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	Haskell

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, miso?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Material UI vs miso: What are the differences?

Component Library: Material UI is primarily a UI component library for React, offering a wide range of pre-designed components such as buttons, cards, and navigation elements. In contrast, Miso is a lightweight web framework that focuses on building interactive web applications using the Elm programming language.
Styling Approach: Material UI provides styling solutions through JSS (JavaScript Style Sheets) allowing for component-level theming and customization. Conversely, Miso follows a more functional approach to styling through Elm's type-safe language and architecture.
Programming Language: Material UI is designed for use with JavaScript and React applications, leveraging the features of these technologies. On the other hand, Miso utilizes the functional programming language Elm, known for its strong type system and purity.
State Management: Material UI does not include state management capabilities and usually relies on libraries like Redux or React's Context API for managing application state. Miso, however, incorporates its own state management approach using the Elm Architecture, making state management seamless and predictable.
Server-side Rendering: Material UI lacks built-in support for server-side rendering, which can impact initial load times and SEO. In contrast, Miso comes with server-side rendering capabilities out of the box, improving performance and SEO for web applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Material UI benefits from a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. On the other hand, Miso's community may be smaller in comparison, but it provides a niche focus on functional programming and Elm-specific challenges.

Material UI vs miso

Overview