Material-UI vs PrimeFaces

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

PrimeFaces

Stacks111

Followers190

Votes4

Material-UI vs PrimeFaces: What are the differences?

Introduction: Material-UI and PrimeFaces are two popular front-end frameworks used for building web applications. While both frameworks offer a range of components and features to enhance the user interface, there are several key differences that set them apart.

Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the Material Design principles developed by Google, which emphasizes the use of clean, minimalistic design elements and animations. On the other hand, PrimeFaces embraces a rich set of pre-designed themes and widgets that provide a more traditional and customizable look and feel.
Component Library: Material-UI offers a comprehensive library of components and controls that adhere to the Material Design guidelines. These components include buttons, cards, menus, and form elements, among others, providing a consistent and visually appealing user interface. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, offers a larger set of components and widgets, including data tables, charts, and multimedia players, catering to a wider range of application needs.
Integration with Back-End Technologies: Material-UI is primarily designed to work with React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It seamlessly integrates with React and leverages its powerful features such as Virtual DOM and reusable components. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, is built on top of JavaServer Faces (JSF), a Java-based web application framework. It provides server-side rendering and component-based architecture, which can be a preferred choice for Java developers.
Customization and Theming: Material-UI provides a robust theming system that allows developers to customize the look and feel of their applications. It offers a range of predefined color palettes and styling options that can be easily customized to match the application's branding. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, provides a wide range of pre-designed themes that can be easily applied to the application. It also supports custom theming, but the level of customization may be limited compared to Material-UI.
Community and Support: Material-UI has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums, documentation, and third-party libraries. It also has good integration with popular development tools and libraries. PrimeFaces also has a dedicated community and provides extensive documentation and support, but its community may not be as large as that of Material-UI.
Third-Party Integration: Material-UI has good compatibility with various third-party libraries and tools, allowing developers to seamlessly integrate additional functionalities into their applications. It also has a rich ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, provides built-in support for many popular Java technologies, such as JavaServer Faces, Java EE, and PrimeFaces Extensions, which can be advantageous for Java-centric applications.

In summary, Material-UI and PrimeFaces differ in their design philosophy, component libraries, integration with back-end technologies, customization capabilities, community support, and third-party integration. Choosing between the two depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, PrimeFaces

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	PrimeFaces
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	It is a popular open source framework for JavaServer Faces featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, client side validation, theme engine and more.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	Touch optimized; Client side validation
Statistics
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 111
Followers 3.7K	Followers 190
Votes 445	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table	Pros 2 JEE Integration 1 Support Contract available 1 Nice Components Cons 1 Some components have to be bought 1 JSF
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	JavaScript Spring Boot

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, PrimeFaces?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Material-UI vs PrimeFaces: What are the differences?

Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the Material Design principles developed by Google, which emphasizes the use of clean, minimalistic design elements and animations. On the other hand, PrimeFaces embraces a rich set of pre-designed themes and widgets that provide a more traditional and customizable look and feel.
Component Library: Material-UI offers a comprehensive library of components and controls that adhere to the Material Design guidelines. These components include buttons, cards, menus, and form elements, among others, providing a consistent and visually appealing user interface. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, offers a larger set of components and widgets, including data tables, charts, and multimedia players, catering to a wider range of application needs.
Integration with Back-End Technologies: Material-UI is primarily designed to work with React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It seamlessly integrates with React and leverages its powerful features such as Virtual DOM and reusable components. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, is built on top of JavaServer Faces (JSF), a Java-based web application framework. It provides server-side rendering and component-based architecture, which can be a preferred choice for Java developers.
Customization and Theming: Material-UI provides a robust theming system that allows developers to customize the look and feel of their applications. It offers a range of predefined color palettes and styling options that can be easily customized to match the application's branding. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, provides a wide range of pre-designed themes that can be easily applied to the application. It also supports custom theming, but the level of customization may be limited compared to Material-UI.
Community and Support: Material-UI has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums, documentation, and third-party libraries. It also has good integration with popular development tools and libraries. PrimeFaces also has a dedicated community and provides extensive documentation and support, but its community may not be as large as that of Material-UI.
Third-Party Integration: Material-UI has good compatibility with various third-party libraries and tools, allowing developers to seamlessly integrate additional functionalities into their applications. It also has a rich ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions. PrimeFaces, on the other hand, provides built-in support for many popular Java technologies, such as JavaServer Faces, Java EE, and PrimeFaces Extensions, which can be advantageous for Java-centric applications.

Material-UI vs PrimeFaces

Overview