StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs PrimeNg

Material-UI vs PrimeNg

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
PrimeNg
PrimeNg
Stacks229
Followers286
Votes15
GitHub Stars12.1K
Forks5.0K

Material-UI vs PrimeNg: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Material-UI and PrimeNG, two popular UI component libraries for web development.

1. Component Styles and Design:

Material-UI follows Google's Material Design guidelines, which focuses on creating clean and modern user interfaces with a flat design. It offers a wide range of pre-designed components with Material Design styles and animations.

PrimeNG, on the other hand, has a rich set of components with a more traditional and business-oriented design style. It provides various customizable themes and styles that can be easily applied to the components.

2. Component Library Size:

Material-UI is known for its lightweight nature and smaller package size. It focuses on providing essential UI components and keeps the bundle size minimal to improve performance. This makes it suitable for projects where size and performance optimizations are important.

PrimeNG, on the other hand, offers a more extensive set of components, including advanced features like complex data tables, charts, and grids. As a result, the library size of PrimeNG is generally larger compared to Material-UI.

3. Supported Technologies and Frameworks:

Material-UI is primarily designed for React and provides out-of-the-box support for React applications. It integrates seamlessly with React's component-based architecture and provides React-specific features like hooks and context API.

PrimeNG, on the other hand, is developed for Angular and offers a wide range of components specifically tailored for Angular applications. It leverages Angular's features like dependency injection and change detection to provide optimal performance and compatibility.

4. Component Customization and Theming:

Material-UI offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to easily modify the styles and appearance of components. It provides theming support, allowing the creation of custom themes and the ability to override default styles.

PrimeNG also provides a variety of customization options, allowing developers to modify the styles and behavior of components. It supports theming through the PrimeNG ThemeRoller, which allows users to create custom themes without writing CSS.

5. Community and Documentation:

Material-UI has a large and active community, with a wide range of resources, tutorials, and third-party libraries available. It has extensive documentation with examples and guides, making it easier for developers to get started and find solutions to common problems.

PrimeNG also has a vibrant community and offers comprehensive documentation with examples and guides. It has an active forum where users can ask questions, share ideas, and get support from the community.

6. Browser Compatibility:

Material-UI is designed to work smoothly across different modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. It takes advantage of CSS modern features and ensures a consistent experience across browsers.

PrimeNG is also compatible with all major browsers, ensuring a consistent experience across platforms. It provides cross-browser compatibility by leveraging the best practices of web development.

In Summary, Material-UI follows Material Design guidelines, has a smaller library size, supports React, offers extensive customization options, has a large community, and has excellent browser compatibility. PrimeNG has a more traditional design style, has a larger library size, supports Angular, offers customization options through themes, has an active community, and ensures cross-browser compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
PrimeNg
PrimeNg

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Single library for all components; supports templating; Active development; offers a list of themes for UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
229
Followers
3.7K
Followers
286
Votes
445
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 6
    Complete
  • 4
    Wide range of components
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Modern UI components that work across the web
  • 1
    Already 17+ version up
Cons
  • 4
    Components are hard to customize
  • 3
    Need to buy themes
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Hard to understand
  • 2
    No documentation
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
Angular
Angular
Angular CLI
Angular CLI

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, PrimeNg?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase