StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs React Spectrum

Material-UI vs React Spectrum

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
React Spectrum
React Spectrum
Stacks6
Followers23
Votes1
GitHub Stars14.5K
Forks1.3K

Material-UI vs React Spectrum: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison of the key differences between Material-UI and React Spectrum, two popular UI libraries used with React.

  1. Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the Material Design guidelines by Google, focusing on creating visually appealing and interactive UI components. React Spectrum, on the other hand, aims for a more accessible and inclusive design system, following the Adobe Spectrum Design System.

  2. Component Set: Material-UI offers a comprehensive set of pre-styled and ready-to-use UI components, covering a wide range of use cases. React Spectrum provides a smaller set of components, but they are highly customizable and modular, allowing developers to build their own specific components more easily.

  3. Styling Approach: Material-UI provides a styling solution called JSS (JavaScript Style Sheets), which allows styling components using JavaScript objects. React Spectrum uses CSS-in-JS approach and provides support for CSS modules and CSS variables, allowing developers to leverage more traditional CSS syntax.

  4. Component Theming: Material-UI includes built-in theming support, allowing developers to easily customize the look and feel of their components. React Spectrum also supports theming but takes a more flexible approach, where components can adapt to the parent theme or have their own specific themes.

  5. Component Accessibility: Material-UI puts a strong emphasis on accessibility, with many components following the WCAG standards. React Spectrum also prioritizes accessibility, but it includes additional features such as automatic keyboard focus management and ARIA attribute support to enhance accessibility.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Material-UI has a large and active community with extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of third-party integrations and resources available. React Spectrum, being a newer library, has a growing community and ecosystem, but may have a smaller number of resources and integrations compared to Material-UI.

In Summary, Material-UI offers a comprehensive set of pre-styled components with a focus on Material Design, while React Spectrum provides a smaller but highly customizable component set with a more inclusive design approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, React Spectrum

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
React Spectrum
React Spectrum

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

It is a React implementation of Spectrum, Adobe's design system. It provides components that are adaptive to interactions and screen sizes across devices, and includes full screen reader and keyboard navigation support for accessibility.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Components are designed with accessibility top-of-mind and include full screen reader and keyboard navigation support; Components are designed to work with mouse, touch, and keyboard interactions. They’re built with responsive design principles to deliver a great experience, no matter the device; Supports custom themes to match your brand, including automatic support for dark mode; Components are designed to support over 30 languages, including support for right-to-left languages, date and number formatting, and more
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
6
Followers
3.7K
Followers
23
Votes
445
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 1
    Consistant UI
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
React
React

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, React Spectrum?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase