StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs Rebass

Material-UI vs Rebass

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
Rebass
Rebass
Stacks21
Followers25
Votes0

Material-UI vs Rebass: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When choosing between Material-UI and Rebass for building user interfaces, it's essential to understand their key differences to make an informed decision.

1. **Component Library**: Material-UI is a comprehensive UI component library that follows Google's Material Design guidelines, offering a wide range of pre-built components like buttons, cards, and menus. In contrast, Rebass provides a minimalist set of primitive UI components for creating simple and customizable designs, emphasizing composition over predefined components.
  
2. **Styling Approach**: Material-UI uses JSS (JavaScript Style Sheets) for styling components, allowing for dynamic styles based on component props and themes. On the other hand, Rebass utilizes inline styles with the Styled System library, promoting consistent design tokens and responsive design out of the box without needing additional configuration.
  
3. **Theming Capabilities**: Material-UI provides a robust theming system to customize the look and feel of components globally, making it easier to maintain design consistency across an application. In comparison, Rebass offers a simpler theming approach, allowing developers to pass theme properties directly to components for quick color and typography changes.
  
4. **Community Support**: Material-UI has a larger and more active community of developers, resulting in frequent updates, comprehensive documentation, and a wide range of third-party plugins and extensions. Rebass, while less popular, fosters a tight-knit community focused on minimalist design principles and fast prototyping for simple projects.
  
5. **Bundle Size**: Material-UI's extensive component library and additional features can lead to a larger bundle size, especially when using features like built-in animations and transitions. Rebass, with its lightweight approach and emphasis on essential components, typically results in smaller bundle sizes, making it ideal for performance-critical applications.
  
6. **Learning Curve**: Material-UI's comprehensive nature and adherence to Material Design guidelines may require a steeper learning curve for developers unfamiliar with such conventions. In contrast, Rebass's minimalist approach and emphasis on simplicity make it more accessible for beginners and those looking for a lightweight UI solution.

In Summary, Material-UI offers a feature-rich component library following Material Design guidelines with a focus on theming and customization, while Rebass provides a minimalist set of components for quick prototyping and lightweight applications suited for beginners and performance optimization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Rebass

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
Rebass
Rebass

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Rebass is a library of highly-composable, primitive UI components for React, built with styled-components to keep styles isolated and reduce the need to write custom CSS in your application.

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
-
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
21
Followers
3.7K
Followers
25
Votes
445
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js
React
React

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Rebass?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase