Material-UI vs Telerik UI Comparison | StackShare

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.3K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Telerik UI

Stacks19

Followers24

Votes0

Telerik UI vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Material-UI and Telerik UI are popular UI component libraries that provide pre-designed elements for building web applications. Here are the main differences between Material-UI and Telerik UI:

Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows Google's Material Design guidelines, offering a modern and sleek design with a focus on simplicity and usability. Telerik UI, on the other hand, provides a more customizable and visually rich set of components with various themes to choose from.
Theming and Customization: Material-UI's theming system allows developers to easily customize the appearance of components by overriding default styles. Telerik UI provides a wider range of pre-designed themes that offer extensive customization options, making it easier to achieve specific design goals.
Integration with Frameworks: Material-UI is tightly integrated with React and is often the choice for React-based projects. Telerik UI supports multiple frameworks, including Angular, React, Vue, and ASP.NET MVC, offering flexibility for developers using different technologies.
Component Variety: Material-UI offers a comprehensive set of components aligned with Material Design principles, including buttons, forms, cards, and navigation elements. Telerik UI provides a diverse range of components, including data grids, charts, rich text editors, and more, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications.
Learning Curve: Material-UI's adherence to Material Design guidelines might make it easier for developers already familiar with those principles. Telerik UI's wide range of components and customization options might require a steeper learning curve, but it offers greater flexibility.
Community and Support: Material-UI has a large and active community, with extensive documentation and resources available online. Telerik UI offers robust technical support and professional services, which can be beneficial for complex enterprise projects.

In summary, Material-UI follows Google's Material Design for a clean and consistent design approach, while Telerik UI offers greater customization and variety across multiple frameworks, making it suitable for diverse application requirements.

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Telerik UI
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	It includes more than 100 versatile and performance-optimized components that help you build high-quality, professional line-of-business projects. From the leading AJAX data grid to the full-featured HTML editor used by Microsoft on sites like MSDN, It provides you with all the building blocks to maximize productivity and build richer, slicker and better-performing applications with ease.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	Complete Set of Features and Controls; Seamless UX Across Devices and Browsers; 21 Built-In Professional Grade Skins
Statistics
Stacks 2.3K	Stacks 19
Followers 3.7K	Followers 24
Votes 445	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Telerik UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.