Materialize vs Polymer

Overview

Polymer

Stacks557

Followers463

Votes122

GitHub Stars22.1K

Forks2.0K

Materialize

Stacks698

Followers1.2K

Votes557

GitHub Stars39.1K

Forks4.7K

Materialize vs Polymer: What are the differences?

Developers describe Materialize as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design. On the other hand, Polymer is detailed as "A new library built on top of Web Components, designed to leverage the evolving web platform on modern browsers". Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

Materialize and Polymer belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

"Google material design" is the primary reason why developers consider Materialize over the competitors, whereas "Web components" was stated as the key factor in picking Polymer.

Materialize and Polymer are both open source tools. It seems that Materialize with 36.1K GitHub stars and 4.8K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Polymer with 21.1K GitHub stars and 2K GitHub forks.

The3ballsoft, GeoLytix, and Avhana Health are some of the popular companies that use Materialize, whereas Polymer is used by AX Semantics, USERcycle, and Telemetry. Materialize has a broader approval, being mentioned in 46 company stacks & 55 developers stacks; compared to Polymer, which is listed in 42 company stacks and 32 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Polymer, Materialize

Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET Core

JavaScript

React

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Polymer	Materialize
Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.	A CSS Framework based on material design.
-	Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.1K	GitHub Stars 39.1K
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 557	Stacks 698
Followers 463	Followers 1.2K
Votes 122	Votes 557
Pros & Cons
Pros 52 Web components 30 Material design 14 HTML 13 Components 5 Open source Cons 1 Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad	Pros 102 Google material design 74 Responsive 74 Easy to use 54 Modern looks 48 Open source Cons 7 Mobile errors 6 Poor Grid System 2 Unmaintained

What are some alternatives to Polymer, Materialize?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

"Google material design" is the primary reason why developers consider Materialize over the competitors, whereas "Web components" was stated as the key factor in picking Polymer.

Materialize vs Polymer