StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Materialize vs Tailwind Starter Kit

Materialize vs Tailwind Starter Kit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
Tailwind Starter Kit
Tailwind Starter Kit
Stacks15
Followers70
Votes29

Materialize vs Tailwind Starter Kit: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When deciding between Materialize and Tailwind Starter Kit for web development projects, it's crucial to understand their key differences to choose the most suitable framework for your needs.

1. **File Size**: Materialize includes a comprehensive set of components and features in its framework, leading to a larger file size compared to Tailwind Starter Kit. This can impact the loading time of a website, especially on devices with slower internet connections.
   
2. **Pre-designed Components**: Materialize provides pre-designed components with specific styles and functionalities out of the box. In contrast, Tailwind Starter Kit offers utility classes that allow more flexibility in designing custom and bespoke user interfaces.

3. **Flexibility**: Tailwind Starter Kit emphasizes a utility-first approach, enabling developers to quickly build and prototype websites by applying classes directly in the HTML markup. On the other hand, Materialize follows a more structured approach with pre-defined CSS classes for styling elements.

4. **Customization Capabilities**: Tailwind Starter Kit allows for extensive customization through its configuration file, enabling developers to tailor the design system to suit project requirements. In comparison, Materialize has a predefined design language that may limit the level of customization available.

5. **Learning Curve**: Materialize offers a more opinionated and structured framework, which can simplify the development process for beginners but might also require them to adhere closely to its styling conventions. Tailwind Starter Kit, with its utility-first approach, presents a steeper learning curve initially due to the need to understand and utilize utility classes effectively.

6. **Community Support**: Materialize, being a well-established framework, has a larger community of users and contributors, resulting in extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. Tailwind Starter Kit, although gaining popularity, might have a smaller community presence, potentially affecting the availability of relevant resources and assistance.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Materialize and Tailwind Starter Kit in areas such as file size, pre-designed components, flexibility, customization capabilities, learning curve, and community support can help in making an informed decision for web development projects. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
Tailwind Starter Kit
Tailwind Starter Kit

A CSS Framework based on material design.

It is Free and Open Source. It does not change or add any CSS to the already one fromTailwindCSS. It features multiple HTML elements and it comes with dynamic components for ReactJS, Vue and Angular.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Comes with a huge number of Fully Coded CSS components; Comes with 3 sample pages. They are fully coded so you can start working instantly; Feature many dynamic components for React, Vue and Angular
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
698
Stacks
15
Followers
1.2K
Followers
70
Votes
557
Votes
29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
Pros
  • 5
    Easier
  • 5
    Open Source
  • 5
    Multiple Components
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    Practical
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Tailwind Starter Kit?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase