StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Materialize vs Web Components

Materialize vs Web Components

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K
Web Components
Web Components
Stacks82
Followers60
Votes0

Materialize vs Web Components: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. HTML Structure: Materialize is a CSS framework that helps in designing responsive websites, whereas Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML elements.
  2. Cross-browser Support: Materialize provides consistent styling across different browsers and devices, while Web Components may require polyfills to work properly in older browsers.
  3. Component Reusability: Materialize provides pre-designed components that can be easily integrated into a website, while Web Components allow you to create your own custom elements for reuse in different parts of a web application.
  4. Tooling and Compatibility: Materialize comes with predefined styles and components that can be directly used, whereas Web Components require some level of tooling, like Babel or Webpack, for compatibility across browsers.
  5. Community and Documentation: Materialize has a larger community and more comprehensive documentation available for developers to troubleshoot and learn, compared to Web Components, which may have limited resources and support.
  6. Browser Performance: Materialize may have better performance optimization out of the box, while Web Components may require additional effort to optimize for browser performance.
In Summary, Materialize is a CSS framework for designing responsive websites, while Web Components are a set of web platform APIs for creating custom, reusable HTML elements with differences in HTML structure, cross-browser support, reusability, tooling, community support, and browser performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Materialize, Web Components

Gericke
Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET CoreJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReact

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
Web Components
Web Components

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Web components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps.

Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
698
Stacks
82
Followers
1.2K
Followers
60
Votes
557
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Materialize, Web Components?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase