StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Maven vs Selenium

Apache Maven vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K
Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K

Apache Maven vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Apache Maven vs Selenium

Apache Maven and Selenium are both widely used tools in the software development industry. While Apache Maven is a build automation tool primarily used for project management, Selenium is a testing framework for web applications. Despite their similarities in the software development process, there are several key differences between Apache Maven and Selenium that set them apart.

  1. Purpose: Apache Maven is primarily used for automating the build process, including compiling source code, packaging, and creating documentation. It focuses on managing project dependencies and ensuring consistent builds across different environments. On the other hand, Selenium is specifically designed for automated testing of web applications, providing a framework for writing and executing test scripts.

  2. Domain: Apache Maven targets the entire software development life cycle, from building to delivering the project. It helps manage the complete project structure, including the compilation, testing, packaging, and deployment phases. In contrast, Selenium is more specialized towards the testing phase, concentrating on automating browser actions and verifying the behavior of web applications.

  3. Language Support: Apache Maven is language-agnostic and can be used with various programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, and more. It provides a standardized way to manage dependencies and build processes across different languages. On the other hand, Selenium primarily supports Java, but also offers bindings for other languages like C#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript.

  4. Integration: Apache Maven integrates well with other build tools and development environments. It can be easily combined with continuous integration servers like Jenkins or TeamCity to automate the build and deployment process. Selenium, on the other hand, is designed to integrate with web browsers and provides APIs to interact with browsers and test web applications directly.

  5. Focus: Apache Maven focuses on managing the project's build process, ensuring that it is repeatable and efficient. It provides a declarative approach to define the project structure, dependencies, and build steps in an XML-based configuration file. Selenium, on the other hand, focuses on testing the functionality and behavior of web applications, providing a wide range of tools and APIs for browser automation.

  6. Scope: Apache Maven is a broader tool that can be used in any software project, regardless of the technology stack or the type of application being developed. It is not limited to web applications and can manage dependencies and build processes for various project types. Selenium, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for web applications and provides specialized features for testing web-based functionalities.

In summary, Apache Maven and Selenium serve different purposes in the software development process. Maven focuses on automating the build process and managing project dependencies, while Selenium is a testing framework specifically designed for web applications. Maven has a broader scope and is language-agnostic, while Selenium is specialized for web testing and supports multiple programming languages. Apache Maven integrates well with build and deployment tools, whereas Selenium integrates directly with web browsers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Maven, Selenium

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Selenium
Selenium

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
8.6K
Stacks
3.4K
Stacks
16.2K
Followers
1.7K
Followers
12.6K
Votes
414
Votes
527
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 24
    Record-Playback
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, Selenium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana