McRouter vs ZeroMQ

Overview

ZeroMQ

Stacks258

Followers586

Votes71

GitHub Stars10.6K

Forks2.5K

McRouter

Stacks20

Followers64

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.3K

Forks550

McRouter vs ZeroMQ: What are the differences?

Developers describe McRouter as "A memcached protocol router for scaling memcached deployments, by Facebook". Mcrouter is a memcached protocol router for scaling memcached deployments. It's a core component of cache infrastructure at Facebook and Instagram where mcrouter handles almost 5 billion requests per second at peak. On the other hand, ZeroMQ is detailed as "Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort". The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

McRouter and ZeroMQ are primarily classified as "Memcached" and "Message Queue" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by McRouter are:

Memcached ASCII protocol
Connection pooling
Multiple hashing schemes

On the other hand, ZeroMQ provides the following key features:

Connect your code in any language, on any platform.
Carries messages across inproc, IPC, TCP, TPIC, multicast.
Smart patterns like pub-sub, push-pull, and router-dealer.

McRouter and ZeroMQ are both open source tools. It seems that ZeroMQ with 5.28K GitHub stars and 1.56K forks on GitHub has more adoption than McRouter with 2.48K GitHub stars and 435 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ZeroMQ	McRouter
The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.	Mcrouter is a memcached protocol router for scaling memcached deployments. It's a core component of cache infrastructure at Facebook and Instagram where mcrouter handles almost 5 billion requests per second at peak.
Connect your code in any language, on any platform.;Carries messages across inproc, IPC, TCP, TPIC, multicast.;Smart patterns like pub-sub, push-pull, and router-dealer.;High-speed asynchronous I/O engines, in a tiny library.;Backed by a large and active open source community.;Supports every modern language and platform.;Build any architecture: centralized, distributed, small, or large.;Free software with full commercial support.	Memcached ASCII protocol;Connection pooling;Multiple hashing schemes;Prefix routing;Replicated pools;Production traffic shadowing;Online reconfiguration;Flexible routing;Destination health monitoring/automatic failover;Cold cache warm up;Broadcast operations;Reliable delete stream;Multi-cluster support;Rich stats and debug commands;Quality of service;Large values;Multi-level caches;IPv6 support;SSL support
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.6K	GitHub Stars 3.3K
GitHub Forks 2.5K	GitHub Forks 550
Stacks 258	Stacks 20
Followers 586	Followers 64
Votes 71	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Fast 20 Lightweight 11 Transport agnostic 7 No broker required 4 Low level APIs are in C Cons 5 No message durability 3 Not a very reliable system - message delivery wise 1 M x N problem with M producers and N consumers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Memcached HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)

What are some alternatives to ZeroMQ, McRouter?

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.