StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Metro Bundler vs Webpacker

Metro Bundler vs Webpacker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpacker
Webpacker
Stacks204
Followers48
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.5K
Metro Bundler
Metro Bundler
Stacks13
Followers32
Votes0

Metro Bundler vs Webpacker: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of web development, Metro Bundler and Webpacker are popular tools used for bundling and managing assets in different types of projects. While both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between these two tools that developers should be aware of.

  1. Packager Type: One significant difference between Metro Bundler and Webpacker lies in their packager type. Metro Bundler is specifically designed for React Native projects, optimizing the bundling process for mobile applications. On the other hand, Webpacker is a versatile tool that caters to a wide range of web projects, including those using frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue.

  2. Configuration Flexibility: When it comes to configuration flexibility, Webpacker offers more customization options compared to Metro Bundler. Webpacker allows developers to tweak and fine-tune various settings, plugins, and loaders to better suit their project requirements. In contrast, Metro Bundler has a more opinionated configuration setup tailored for React Native projects with fewer customization options.

  3. Entry Points: In terms of entry points, Webpacker supports multiple entry points, allowing developers to define multiple target files for bundling. This flexibility is beneficial for projects with different modules or components that need to be bundled separately. In contrast, Metro Bundler typically has a single entry point, mainly suited for bundling the entire application codebase in React Native projects.

  4. Code Splitting: Webpacker has built-in support for code splitting, enabling developers to split their bundle into multiple smaller files that can be loaded on demand. This feature is useful for optimizing performance by reducing initial load times and only loading the necessary modules when required. On the other hand, Metro Bundler has limited support for code splitting, focusing more on bundling the entire application upfront.

  5. Community Support: Another key difference between Metro Bundler and Webpacker is the level of community support and documentation available. Webpacker has a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, plugins, and resources available to help developers troubleshoot issues and explore advanced features. In contrast, Metro Bundler, being more specialized for React Native, may have a smaller community and fewer resources compared to Webpacker.

  6. Runtime Environment: Metro Bundler is optimized for the specific runtime environment of React Native applications, tailoring the bundling process to meet the unique requirements of mobile development. Webpacker, on the other hand, is designed to work seamlessly in various web environments, offering compatibility with different browsers and server configurations. This difference in runtime environment optimization makes each tool more suitable for specific project types.

In Summary, Metro Bundler and Webpacker vary in their packager type, configuration flexibility, entry points, code splitting support, community resources, and runtime environment optimization, catering to distinct project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Webpacker
Webpacker
Metro Bundler
Metro Bundler

Webpacker makes it easy to use the JavaScript preprocessor and bundler Webpack to manage application-like JavaScript in Rails. It coexists with the asset pipeline, as the purpose is only to use Webpack for app-like JavaScript, not images, css, or even JavaScript Sprinkles (that all continues to live in app/assets).

🚅 Fast: We aim for sub-second reload cycles, fast startup and quick bundling speeds. ⚖️ Scalable: Works with thousands of modules in a single application. ⚛️ Integrated: Supports every React Native project out of the box.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
204
Stacks
13
Followers
48
Followers
32
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Rails
Rails
Webpack
Webpack
React Native
React Native
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Webpacker, Metro Bundler?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana