StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Milligram vs new.css

Milligram vs new.css

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Milligram
Milligram
Stacks38
Followers81
Votes50
GitHub Stars10.2K
Forks738
new.css
new.css
Stacks3
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.0K
Forks128

Milligram vs new.css: What are the differences?

# Milligram vs new.css

Milligram and new.css are both lightweight CSS frameworks that aim to provide a minimalistic approach to styling web applications. However, there are key differences between the two that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Grid System**: Milligram utilizes a 12-column grid system while new.css uses an 8-column grid system. This difference in grid layout can affect how developers structure their layouts and align elements on the page.

2. **Typography**: Milligram includes a limited set of typography styles, focusing on readability and simplicity. In contrast, new.css offers a wider range of typographic options, allowing for more customization and design flexibility when it comes to text styling.

3. **Component Library**: Milligram provides a minimal set of UI components such as buttons, forms, and tables. On the other hand, new.css offers a more extensive library of components, including modals, tooltips, and dropdowns, making it a better choice for projects that require a variety of interactive elements.

4. **Customization Options**: While both frameworks are lightweight, Milligram offers less customization options compared to new.css. Developers looking for a more configurable CSS framework may find new.css to be a better choice for their projects.

5. **Browser Support**: Milligram focuses on supporting modern browsers, while new.css ensures compatibility with older browsers as well. This difference in browser support can be crucial for projects that need to reach a wide audience with varying browser preferences.

6. **Documentation and Community**: Milligram has a smaller user base and community compared to new.css, which has a more extensive documentation and support network. Developers looking for a framework with comprehensive resources and a strong community presence may prefer new.css for their projects.

In Summary, the key differences between Milligram and new.css lie in their grid systems, typography options, component libraries, customization capabilities, browser support, and community resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Milligram
Milligram
new.css
new.css

Milligram provides a minimal setup of styles for a fast and clean starting point. Specially designed for better performance and higher productivity with fewer properties to reset resulting in cleaner code.

It is a classless CSS framework to write modern websites using only HTML. It automatically applies a light/dark theme based on your browser's preference. It supports custom color themes and fonts using CSS variables.

-
~4.5kb in size; Automatically applies a light/dark; Supports custom color themes and fonts using CSS variables
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.2K
GitHub Stars
4.0K
GitHub Forks
738
GitHub Forks
128
Stacks
38
Stacks
3
Followers
81
Followers
12
Votes
50
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Weightless
  • 6
    Flexbox
  • 4
    Responsiveness
  • 4
    Grids
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Milligram, new.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase