miso vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?
miso: 🍜 A tasty Haskell front-end framework. Miso is a small "isomorphic" Haskell front-end framework featuring a virtual-dom, diffing / patching algorithm, event delegation, event batching, SVG, Server-sent events, Websockets, and an extensible Subscription-based subsystem; Semantic UI: A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language. Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.
miso and Semantic UI can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
miso and Semantic UI are both open source tools. Semantic UI with 45.9K GitHub stars and 4.84K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than miso with 1.33K GitHub stars and 95 GitHub forks.
What is miso?
What is Semantic UI?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose miso?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using miso?
What companies use miso?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling
import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.
React Helmet was chosen to handle
<head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct
<title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.
<style> tags when using #StyledComponents.
React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.
Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.
We use Semantic UI for our frotend. A heavily customised version of it, but still Semantic UI under the hood.
Used Semantic UI + Angular2 together with Spring or Node/Express for full stack web application development.