Mithril vs Next.js

Overview

Mithril

Stacks89

Followers79

Votes86

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

Mithril vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe Mithril as "Client-side MVC framework - a tool to organize code in a way that is easy to think about and to maintain". Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization. On the other hand, Next.js is detailed as "*A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps *". Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Mithril can be classified as a tool in the "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category, while Next.js is grouped under "Frameworks (Full Stack)".

Some of the features offered by Mithril are:

Only 12kb gzipped, no dependencies
Small API, small learning curve
Safe-by-default templates

On the other hand, Next.js provides the following key features:

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API
Only JavaScript. Everything is a function
Automatic server rendering and code splitting

"Lightweight" is the primary reason why developers consider Mithril over the competitors, whereas "Automatic server rendering and code splitting" was stated as the key factor in picking Next.js.

Mithril and Next.js are both open source tools. It seems that Next.js with 38.2K GitHub stars and 4.6K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mithril with 11.3K GitHub stars and 859 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Next.js has a broader approval, being mentioned in 79 company stacks & 66 developers stacks; compared to Mithril, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Mithril, Next.js

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mithril	Next.js
Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.	Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
Only 12kb gzipped, no dependencies;Small API, small learning curve;Safe-by-default templates;Hierarchical MVC via components;Virtual DOM diffing and compilable templates;Intelligent auto-redrawing system	Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 135.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.7K
Stacks 89	Stacks 8.0K
Followers 79	Followers 5.1K
Votes 86	Votes 330
Pros & Cons
Pros 16 Lightweight 12 Faster than React 10 Virtual Dom 10 Pure JavaScript 8 Robust Cons 1 Virtual Dom	Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
TypeScript JavaScript	React

What are some alternatives to Mithril, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Mithril are:

Only 12kb gzipped, no dependencies
Small API, small learning curve
Safe-by-default templates

On the other hand, Next.js provides the following key features:

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API
Only JavaScript. Everything is a function
Automatic server rendering and code splitting

Mithril vs Next.js