StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MongoDB vs ObjectBox

MongoDB vs ObjectBox

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
ObjectBox
ObjectBox
Stacks9
Followers20
Votes0

MongoDB vs ObjectBox: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare MongoDB and ObjectBox - two popular database technologies used in modern web development. Each of these databases has its own strengths and weaknesses, and understanding the key differences between them can help developers make informed decisions when selecting a database for their projects.

  1. Scalability: One of the key differences between MongoDB and ObjectBox lies in their scalability capabilities. MongoDB is designed to scale horizontally, meaning that it can distribute data across multiple servers to handle large amounts of data and high traffic loads. On the other hand, ObjectBox is optimized for mobile and IoT devices and is tailored for local data storage and synchronization. While ObjectBox can also handle large datasets, it is not designed for horizontal scaling like MongoDB.

  2. Data Structure: MongoDB is a document-oriented database, where data is stored in flexible, schema-less documents called BSON (Binary JSON). This means that each document can have a different structure, allowing for easy schema evolution and flexibility in data storage. ObjectBox, on the other hand, is an object-oriented database where data is stored as objects in a specific structure defined by a schema. This allows for efficient querying and type-safety at the expense of flexibility.

  3. Data Relationships: MongoDB supports complex data relationships through its flexible document model and the use of references or embedded documents. This allows for the creation of complex relationships between different entities in the database. ObjectBox, however, does not natively support complex relationships between objects. It focuses on efficient object storage and retrieval rather than complex data relationships.

  4. Performance: MongoDB is known for its high performance, especially when it comes to read-heavy workloads. It leverages memory-mapped storage and various indexing techniques to provide fast access to data. ObjectBox, on the other hand, is specifically optimized for mobile and IoT devices and offers high-performance local data storage and retrieval with low latency.

  5. Querying: MongoDB provides a flexible and powerful query language called MongoDB Query Language (MQL) which supports complex queries with aggregation pipelines and indexes to optimize query performance. ObjectBox, on the other hand, uses a simple and efficient query API based on criteria queries, which allows for fast and precise data retrieval but lacks the flexibility of MQL.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: MongoDB has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and libraries available for developers. It also integrates well with other popular web technologies. ObjectBox, being a relatively newer technology, has a smaller community and ecosystem. While it might not have the same level of community support as MongoDB, it does have a dedicated team behind it and is continuously growing.

In Summary, MongoDB is a scalable, document-oriented database with a flexible schema and support for complex data relationships, while ObjectBox is an optimized, object-oriented database designed for high-performance, local data storage and retrieval.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, ObjectBox

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
ObjectBox
ObjectBox

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

It is for developers who look for performance and ease of use. We are committed to providing you with the easiest APIs for you to keep your code short and maintainable. No SQL under the hood-Simply faster. Unlike other databases, it has been built from the ground up using key-value storage instead of column storage. The resulting performance is 10x faster than the leading alternative, we welcome you to try it yourself. It is fast regardless of the amount of data or operating system you are using.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
10x faster than any alternative; Reduces cloud costs up to 60%; Supports Linux, Windows, Mac/iOS, Android, Raspbian, etc. Embedded or Containerized; Develop applications that work on- and offline, independently from a constant Internet connection, providing an “always-on”-feeling; Accelerate time-to-market, save development and lifecycle costs, save precious developer time for tasks that bring value
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
9
Followers
82.0K
Followers
20
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Android OS
Android OS
macOS
macOS
iOS
iOS
Windows
Windows
Raspbian
Raspbian

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, ObjectBox?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase