MQTT vs Mosca

Overview

MQTT

Stacks637

Followers577

Votes7

Mosca

Stacks16

Followers43

Votes0

MQTT vs Mosca: What are the differences?

Protocol Type: MQTT stands for Message Queuing Telemetry Transport, which is a lightweight messaging protocol designed for small sensors and mobile devices. Mosca, on the other hand, is a fully featured MQTT broker that provides support for QoS levels, message retention, etc.
Functionality: While MQTT is a protocol that defines the format and rules for data exchange, Mosca is a specific implementation of an MQTT broker. Mosca is essentially software that implements the MQTT protocol and can be used to build an MQTT-based messaging infrastructure.
Customization: MQTT can be used with various MQTT brokers, including Mosca, HiveMQ, etc. However, Mosca allows for easier customization and configuration of an MQTT broker to fit specific requirements of an application or system.
Scalability: MQTT itself is a scalable protocol that can handle a large number of devices and messages efficiently. Mosca, as an MQTT broker, has scalability features built-in to manage heavy loads of messages and clients.
Ease of Use: While MQTT is a standardized protocol that requires adherence to specific rules for communication, Mosca simplifies the process of setting up and managing an MQTT broker by providing a user-friendly interface and configuration options.
Support and Community: MQTT has a wide adoption and support among IoT community and industry, while Mosca may have a smaller user base but offers dedicated support and resources for users utilizing this particular MQTT broker implementation.

In Summary, MQTT and Mosca differ in terms of protocol type, functionality, customization, scalability, ease of use, and support within the IoT community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

MQTT	Mosca
It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.	A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.
-	MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 compliant; QoS 0 and QoS 1; Various storage options for QoS 1 offline packets, and subscriptions; Usable inside ANY other Node.js app;
Statistics
Stacks 637	Stacks 16
Followers 577	Followers 43
Votes 7	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Varying levels of Quality of Service to fit a range of 2 Lightweight with a relatively small data footprint 2 Very easy to configure and use with open source tools Cons 1 Easy to configure in an unsecure manner	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Node.js

What are some alternatives to MQTT, Mosca?

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

MQTT vs Mosca: What are the differences?

Protocol Type: MQTT stands for Message Queuing Telemetry Transport, which is a lightweight messaging protocol designed for small sensors and mobile devices. Mosca, on the other hand, is a fully featured MQTT broker that provides support for QoS levels, message retention, etc.
Functionality: While MQTT is a protocol that defines the format and rules for data exchange, Mosca is a specific implementation of an MQTT broker. Mosca is essentially software that implements the MQTT protocol and can be used to build an MQTT-based messaging infrastructure.
Customization: MQTT can be used with various MQTT brokers, including Mosca, HiveMQ, etc. However, Mosca allows for easier customization and configuration of an MQTT broker to fit specific requirements of an application or system.
Scalability: MQTT itself is a scalable protocol that can handle a large number of devices and messages efficiently. Mosca, as an MQTT broker, has scalability features built-in to manage heavy loads of messages and clients.
Ease of Use: While MQTT is a standardized protocol that requires adherence to specific rules for communication, Mosca simplifies the process of setting up and managing an MQTT broker by providing a user-friendly interface and configuration options.
Support and Community: MQTT has a wide adoption and support among IoT community and industry, while Mosca may have a smaller user base but offers dedicated support and resources for users utilizing this particular MQTT broker implementation.

In Summary, MQTT and Mosca differ in terms of protocol type, functionality, customization, scalability, ease of use, and support within the IoT community.

MQTT vs Mosca

Overview