StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. MSMQ vs Mosquitto

MSMQ vs Mosquitto

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mosquitto
Mosquitto
Stacks136
Followers306
Votes14
MSMQ
MSMQ
Stacks33
Followers118
Votes3

MSMQ vs Mosquitto: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between MSMQ and Mosquitto

Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) and Mosquitto are two messaging systems that serve different purposes and have distinct features. Below are the key differences between MSMQ and Mosquitto:

1. **Purpose**: MSMQ is designed for Windows-based systems to facilitate communication between applications, while Mosquitto is an open-source message broker that implements the MQTT protocol for efficient communication in Internet of Things (IoT) applications.

2. **Protocol Support**: MSMQ uses a proprietary protocol for communication within the Windows ecosystem, while Mosquitto exclusively supports the MQTT protocol, a lightweight messaging protocol ideal for constrained environments.

3. **Scalability**: MSMQ is primarily used for local communication within a Windows environment and lacks support for large-scale distributed systems, whereas Mosquitto is designed to handle large volumes of messages and is scalable for use in global IoT deployments.

4. **Community Support**: Mosquitto benefits from a vibrant open-source community that actively contributes to its development, while MSMQ is a proprietary technology from Microsoft with limited community-driven enhancements and support.

5. **Platform Independence**: Mosquitto is cross-platform and can be deployed on various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS, whereas MSMQ is tightly integrated with Windows systems and lacks support for other platforms.

6. **Ease of Use**: Mosquitto is known for its lightweight and straightforward configuration, making it easy to set up and manage, while MSMQ can be more complex to configure and maintain due to its integration within the Windows ecosystem.

In Summary, MSMQ and Mosquitto differ in their purpose, protocol support, scalability, community support, platform independence, and ease of use, catering to distinct messaging needs in various applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mosquitto
Mosquitto
MSMQ
MSMQ

It is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices from low power single board computers to full servers.. The MQTT protocol provides a lightweight method of carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe model. This makes it suitable for Internet of Things messaging such as with low power sensors or mobile devices such as phones, embedded computers or microcontrollers.

This technology enables applications running at different times to communicate across heterogeneous networks and systems that may be temporarily offline. Applications send messages to queues and read messages from queues.

Statistics
Stacks
136
Stacks
33
Followers
306
Followers
118
Votes
14
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Simple and light
  • 4
    Performance
Pros
  • 2
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Cloud not needed
Cons
  • 1
    Windows dependency

What are some alternatives to Mosquitto, MSMQ?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase