MQTT vs VerneMQ

Overview

VerneMQ

Stacks31

Followers136

Votes6

MQTT

Stacks635

Followers577

Votes7

MQTT vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

Protocol vs Broker: The key difference between MQTT and VerneMQ is that MQTT is a lightweight messaging protocol designed for small sensors and mobile devices, while VerneMQ is a full-featured MQTT broker that allows devices to connect and communicate using the MQTT protocol.
Open Source vs Protocol Standard: Another difference is that VerneMQ is an open-source MQTT broker, while MQTT itself is a protocol standard that defines the rules for messaging between clients and brokers.
Scalability and High Availability: VerneMQ offers features like clustering, horizontal scaling, and high availability, which are not inherently part of the MQTT protocol. This makes VerneMQ a more suitable choice for large-scale deployments that require robust messaging infrastructure.
Community Support vs Enterprise Support: While MQTT has a large community of users and developers providing support and resources, VerneMQ offers enterprise support options for organizations that need additional assistance and maintenance services.
Advanced Features: VerneMQ includes advanced features such as message persistence, message routing, and fine-grained access controls that are not part of the core MQTT protocol, providing more flexibility and customization options for users.
Security Features: VerneMQ offers enhanced security features such as TLS encryption, client authentication, and authorization plugins, which are essential for securing MQTT messaging in sensitive environments. MQTT, on the other hand, does not provide built-in security features at the protocol level.

In Summary, MQTT is a lightweight messaging protocol, while VerneMQ is a feature-rich MQTT broker with advanced capabilities and enterprise-grade support options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

VerneMQ	MQTT
VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP. It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications.	It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.
Open Source, Apache 2 licensed; QoS 0, QoS 1, QoS 2; MQTT v5.0 fully implemented; Basic Authentication and Authorization; Bridge Support; $SYS Tree for monitoring and reporting; TLS (SSL) Encryption; Websockets Support; Cluster Support with sophisticated self-healing mechanisms; Queue Migration; Prometheus Monitoring; Logging (Console, Files, Syslog); Reporting to Graphite; Extensible Plugin architecture (Erlang, Elixir, Lua); WebHooks Plugins; Multiple Sessions per ClientId; Shared Subscriptions; Proxy Protocol v1, v2;	-
Statistics
Stacks 31	Stacks 635
Followers 136	Followers 577
Votes 6	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Fully open source clustering 1 Open source shared subscriptions 1 Proxy Protocol support 1 MQTT v5 implementation 1 Open Source Message and Metadata Persistence	Pros 3 Varying levels of Quality of Service to fit a range of 2 Very easy to configure and use with open source tools 2 Lightweight with a relatively small data footprint Cons 1 Easy to configure in an unsecure manner
Integrations
MySQL MongoDB PostgreSQL Memcached Redis	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to VerneMQ, MQTT?

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

MQTT vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

Protocol vs Broker: The key difference between MQTT and VerneMQ is that MQTT is a lightweight messaging protocol designed for small sensors and mobile devices, while VerneMQ is a full-featured MQTT broker that allows devices to connect and communicate using the MQTT protocol.
Open Source vs Protocol Standard: Another difference is that VerneMQ is an open-source MQTT broker, while MQTT itself is a protocol standard that defines the rules for messaging between clients and brokers.
Scalability and High Availability: VerneMQ offers features like clustering, horizontal scaling, and high availability, which are not inherently part of the MQTT protocol. This makes VerneMQ a more suitable choice for large-scale deployments that require robust messaging infrastructure.
Community Support vs Enterprise Support: While MQTT has a large community of users and developers providing support and resources, VerneMQ offers enterprise support options for organizations that need additional assistance and maintenance services.
Advanced Features: VerneMQ includes advanced features such as message persistence, message routing, and fine-grained access controls that are not part of the core MQTT protocol, providing more flexibility and customization options for users.
Security Features: VerneMQ offers enhanced security features such as TLS encryption, client authentication, and authorization plugins, which are essential for securing MQTT messaging in sensitive environments. MQTT, on the other hand, does not provide built-in security features at the protocol level.

In Summary, MQTT is a lightweight messaging protocol, while VerneMQ is a feature-rich MQTT broker with advanced capabilities and enterprise-grade support options.

MQTT vs VerneMQ

Overview