StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Mustache vs Twig

Mustache vs Twig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mustache
Mustache
Stacks2.4K
Followers415
Votes50
GitHub Stars16.7K
Forks2.4K
Twig
Twig
Stacks382
Followers157
Votes8

Mustache vs Twig: What are the differences?

Differences Between Mustache and Twig

Mustache and Twig are both popular templating languages used in web development. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart. Here are six key differences between Mustache and Twig:

  1. Template Inheritance: One major difference between Mustache and Twig is the concept of template inheritance. Twig allows for nested templates where you can define a base template and extend or override specific blocks in child templates. Mustache, on the other hand, does not support template inheritance out of the box and requires additional workarounds to achieve similar functionality.

  2. Logic Handling: Twig provides more powerful logic handling capabilities compared to Mustache. Twig allows for the use of control structures like loops, conditionals, and filters, enabling developers to perform complex logic within the template itself. Mustache, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and separates logic from the template, resulting in a more declarative approach.

  3. Extensibility: Twig offers a more extensible templating system compared to Mustache. With Twig, developers can create custom filters and functions, allowing for more flexibility and customization. Mustache, on the other hand, has a limited set of built-in features and lacks the ability to add custom filters or functions.

  4. Strict Syntax: Twig has a more strict and structured syntax compared to Mustache. Twig enforces a well-defined syntax with proper opening and closing tags, making it less prone to errors. Mustache, on the other hand, has a more relaxed syntax and allows for some flexibility in terms of tag placement.

  5. Error Reporting: Twig provides more detailed error reporting compared to Mustache. When an error occurs in a Twig template, it provides clear and informative messages, making it easier to debug and fix issues. Mustache, on the other hand, provides less detailed error messages, making it more challenging to identify and resolve errors.

  6. Popularity and Community Support: Twig has gained more popularity and has a larger community compared to Mustache. This means that Twig has a more extensive collection of documentation, tutorials, and community support available. Developers using Twig can benefit from the active community and easily find resources to help with any issues they encounter. Mustache, on the other hand, may have limited resources and community support due to its comparatively smaller user base.

In summary, Mustache and Twig differ in their approach to template inheritance, logic handling capabilities, extensibility, syntax strictness, error reporting, and community support. These differences make them better suited for different use cases and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mustache
Mustache
Twig
Twig

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

-
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
382
Followers
415
Followers
157
Votes
50
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Dead simple templating
  • 12
    Open source
  • 8
    Small
  • 1
    Support in lots of languages
Pros
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
  • 2
    Gulp
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Mustache, Twig?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase