Overview

Mustache

Stacks2.4K

Followers415

Votes50

GitHub Stars16.7K

Forks2.4K

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

Mustache vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will discuss the key differences between Mustache and TypeScript.

Template vs Programming Language: Mustache is a logic-less template syntax that can be used in various programming languages, while TypeScript is a statically-typed superset of JavaScript that extends the language with additional features and tools.
Data Rendering vs Code Compilation: Mustache is primarily used for rendering data into a template, allowing for clean separation of presentation and logic. On the other hand, TypeScript is a language that compiles into JavaScript code, allowing for the creation of complex applications with strict type checking and advanced language features.
Syntax vs Grammar: Mustache uses its own simple and intuitive syntax for defining variables, loops, conditionals, and partials in templates. TypeScript, being a programming language, has a more comprehensive grammar that includes variables, functions, classes, interfaces, modules, imports, and exports, among other language constructs.
Dynamic vs Static Typing: Mustache templates do not enforce any type system, meaning that the data passed to the template can be of any type. TypeScript, on the other hand, introduces static typing, allowing for type checking at compile-time. This helps catch errors early and improves code maintainability.
Open-source vs Microsoft-backed: Mustache is an open-source project that is maintained by a community of contributors. TypeScript, on the other hand, is developed and supported by Microsoft, which provides regular updates, bug fixes, and new language features.
Runtime vs Compile-time Checking: Mustache templates are checked at runtime for variable resolution and logic evaluation. In contrast, TypeScript provides compile-time checking that ensures type compatibility, syntax correctness, and other language-related errors before the code is executed.

In Summary, Mustache and TypeScript differ in their purpose (template rendering vs programming language), syntax (template-specific vs comprehensive grammar), typing (dynamic vs static), support (open-source vs Microsoft-backed), and checking (runtime vs compile-time).

🔥 Trending in Templating Languages & Extensions on StackShare

Sass Templating Languages Extensions

Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

88

32.2k

Advice on Mustache, TypeScript

Peter

May 17, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

incredible developer tooling and community support
actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k

Comments

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mustache	TypeScript
Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.	TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 16.7K	GitHub Stars 106.6K
GitHub Forks 2.4K	GitHub Forks 13.1K
Stacks 2.4K	Stacks 105.1K
Followers 415	Followers 74.2K
Votes 50	Votes 503
Pros & Cons
Pros 29 Dead simple templating 12 Open source 8 Small 1 Support in lots of languages	Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype

What are some alternatives to Mustache, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.