Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MySQL WorkBench vs SQLyog: What are the differences?
Introduction: MySQL Workbench and SQLyog are both popular tools for managing and working with MySQL databases. Despite serving a similar purpose, they have several key differences that set them apart.
User Interface: MySQL Workbench has a more complex and comprehensive user interface, offering a wide range of features and tools. It provides a visual representation of the database schema and supports various tasks like data modeling, SQL development, and server administration. On the other hand, SQLyog has a simpler and more intuitive interface focused on query writing, execution, and database management.
Operating Systems: MySQL Workbench is available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X, offering compatibility across multiple platforms. On the contrary, SQLyog primarily supports Windows, which can limit its usability for users of other operating systems.
Licensing: MySQL Workbench is an open-source tool that is free to use under the GNU General Public License (GPL). It provides all the essential functionalities without any cost. In contrast, SQLyog comes in both free and paid versions. The free version has limited features, while the paid version offers additional advanced tools and functionalities.
Performance and Optimization: MySQL Workbench provides a suite of performance analysis and optimization tools, allowing users to identify and enhance the performance of their database queries and server settings. SQLyog, on the other hand, focuses more on query execution and management rather than in-depth performance analysis.
Collaboration and Version Control: MySQL Workbench provides built-in support for version control systems like Git, making it easier for teams to collaborate on database projects. It allows users to compare and merge different versions of database models and scripts. SQLyog lacks these built-in collaboration and version control features, making it less suitable for team-based development.
Backup and Restore: MySQL Workbench offers comprehensive backup and restore functionalities, allowing users to create and restore backups of their databases easily. It supports various backup methods like incremental and compressed backups. In contrast, SQLyog has limited backup and restore features, often requiring manual processes or the use of additional tools.
In Summary, MySQL Workbench offers a more comprehensive user interface, supports multiple operating systems, and provides performance analysis and optimization tools. It is also an open-source tool. On the other hand, SQLyog has a simpler interface, primarily supports Windows, offers collaboration and version control features. MySQL Workbench also offers better backup and restore functionalities.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
We were looking a tool that would allow us to do MySQL and PostgreSQL development/administration from a single tool. We decided on Navicat Premium because it can connect to MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases - and simultaneously. It's also compatible with Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure, which we also use.
Moreover, we previously experienced the occasional freezing and crashing in MySQL Workbench. It also suffered from a poor design, with certain features being a bit difficult to find. Meanwhile, phpMyAdmin lacked schema visualization tools and seemed better suited to lightweight day to day transactions than some of the big jobs that we needed to do.
Pros of MySQL WorkBench
- Free7
- Simple7
- Easy to use6
- Clean UI5
- Administration and monitoring module3