Nchan vs PubNub

Overview

PubNub

Stacks249

Followers458

Votes238

Nchan

Stacks126

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.1K

Forks294

Nchan vs PubNub: What are the differences?

Scaling: Nchan is a scalable solution that can be deployed on any infrastructure, while PubNub is a managed service with limited control over scaling depending on the subscription plan.
Flexibility: Nchan offers more flexibility in terms of customizing features and functionalities, whereas PubNub has predefined functionalities that may limit customization options.
Cost: Nchan is an open-source solution with no upfront costs, making it a more cost-effective option for smaller projects, while PubNub requires a subscription fee based on usage and features.
Performance: Nchan can be optimized for specific use cases to achieve optimal performance, whereas PubNub's performance may vary depending on network conditions and server locations.
Data Ownership: With Nchan, users have full control and ownership of their data since it's self-hosted, while PubNub may have data ownership implications due to being a third-party service.
Real-time Push Notifications: PubNub specializes in real-time push notifications with extensive features and integrations, while Nchan may require additional customization for similar functionality.

In Summary, Nchan and PubNub differ in terms of scalability, flexibility, cost, performance, data ownership, and real-time push notification capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PubNub	Nchan
PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.	It is built as a module for the Nginx web server. It can be configured as a standalone server, or as a shim between your application and hundreds, thousands, or millions of live subscribers. It can buffer messages in memory, on-disk, or via Redis.
PubNub SDKs support over 50 of the most popular environments, including: iOS, Android, JavaScript, .NET, Java, Ruby, Python, PHP and many more.;Data Push - Establish and maintain persistent socket connections to any device (mobile, browser, desktop and server) and push data to global audiences in less than ¼ of a second;Presence - Automatically detect when users enter or leave your app and whether machines are online;Storage and Playback- Store your real-time data streams for future access, “playback” or re-publish;Mobile - Easily manage the complexity of real-time apps on mobile devices;Analytics - Simulate an audience of millions. See a live view of audience size, engagement and geography;Security - Protect your real-time data with easy to use enterprise-grade security	flexible pub/sub server; Horizontally scalable (using Redis); Subscribe to hundreds of channels over a single subscriber connection.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 294
Stacks 249	Stacks 126
Followers 458	Followers 19
Votes 238	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Massively scalable & easy to use 25 Easy setup 20 Reliable 19 Great support 14 Flexible to integrate to custom applications Cons 1 Costly	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	NGINX Python Redis

What are some alternatives to PubNub, Nchan?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Nchan vs PubNub: What are the differences?

Scaling: Nchan is a scalable solution that can be deployed on any infrastructure, while PubNub is a managed service with limited control over scaling depending on the subscription plan.
Flexibility: Nchan offers more flexibility in terms of customizing features and functionalities, whereas PubNub has predefined functionalities that may limit customization options.
Cost: Nchan is an open-source solution with no upfront costs, making it a more cost-effective option for smaller projects, while PubNub requires a subscription fee based on usage and features.
Performance: Nchan can be optimized for specific use cases to achieve optimal performance, whereas PubNub's performance may vary depending on network conditions and server locations.
Data Ownership: With Nchan, users have full control and ownership of their data since it's self-hosted, while PubNub may have data ownership implications due to being a third-party service.
Real-time Push Notifications: PubNub specializes in real-time push notifications with extensive features and integrations, while Nchan may require additional customization for similar functionality.

In Summary, Nchan and PubNub differ in terms of scalability, flexibility, cost, performance, data ownership, and real-time push notification capabilities.

Nchan vs PubNub

Overview