Nchan vs uWebSockets

Overview

Nchan

Stacks126

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.1K

Forks294

uWebSockets

Stacks16

Followers52

Votes0

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks1.8K

Nchan vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

Ease of integration: Nchan is a module for Nginx, making it easier to integrate into existing web servers, while uWebSockets is a standalone library that requires separate deployment.
Scalability: Nchan is designed for high scalability with built-in support for clustering and load balancing, whereas uWebSockets may require additional customization for scaling in a distributed environment.
Features: Nchan offers a wide range of features such as WebSocket subprotocols, message buffering, and message broadcasting, which may not be as comprehensive in uWebSockets.
Community support: uWebSockets has a more active and engaged community, providing frequent updates and improvements, while Nchan may have a smaller user base leading to slower updates and fewer community-contributed resources.
Ease of use: uWebSockets is known for its simple and straightforward API, making it easier for developers to get started quickly, whereas Nchan may have a steeper learning curve due to its integration with Nginx.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, uWebSockets is often cited as being faster and more lightweight than Nchan, making it a preferred choice for high-performance applications where speed is critical.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Nchan and uWebSockets can help developers make an informed decision when choosing a WebSocket library for their project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Nchan, uWebSockets

Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nchan	uWebSockets
It is built as a module for the Nginx web server. It can be configured as a standalone server, or as a shim between your application and hundreds, thousands, or millions of live subscribers. It can buffer messages in memory, on-disk, or via Redis.	It is a simple to use yet thoroughly optimized implementation of HTTP and WebSockets. It comes with built-in pub/sub support, HTTP routing, TLS 1.3, IPv6, permessage-deflate and is battle tested as one of the most popular implementations, reaching many end-users daily.
flexible pub/sub server; Horizontally scalable (using Redis); Subscribe to hundreds of channels over a single subscriber connection.	HTTP and Websockets;Built-in pub/sub support;HTTP routing
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.1K	GitHub Stars 18.5K
GitHub Forks 294	GitHub Forks 1.8K
Stacks 126	Stacks 16
Followers 19	Followers 52
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
NGINX Python Redis	C++ Windows Linux macOS

What are some alternatives to Nchan, uWebSockets?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Nchan vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

Ease of integration: Nchan is a module for Nginx, making it easier to integrate into existing web servers, while uWebSockets is a standalone library that requires separate deployment.
Scalability: Nchan is designed for high scalability with built-in support for clustering and load balancing, whereas uWebSockets may require additional customization for scaling in a distributed environment.
Features: Nchan offers a wide range of features such as WebSocket subprotocols, message buffering, and message broadcasting, which may not be as comprehensive in uWebSockets.
Community support: uWebSockets has a more active and engaged community, providing frequent updates and improvements, while Nchan may have a smaller user base leading to slower updates and fewer community-contributed resources.
Ease of use: uWebSockets is known for its simple and straightforward API, making it easier for developers to get started quickly, whereas Nchan may have a steeper learning curve due to its integration with Nginx.
Performance: In terms of raw performance, uWebSockets is often cited as being faster and more lightweight than Nchan, making it a preferred choice for high-performance applications where speed is critical.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Nchan and uWebSockets can help developers make an informed decision when choosing a WebSocket library for their project.

Nchan vs uWebSockets

Overview